Even the BBC website has the journalistic integrity of a pre-school newsletter written by the pre-literate inmates.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4576623.stm
One word in this report needs a (sic) after it, because the scientist being quoted has used the wrong word to denote the transition of Voyager 1 from the Solar System to interstellar space. The word he's used usually denotes a journey with the same start and end point. If Voyager 1 manages to exist for an infinite amount of time, he may well be right. But given that the eventual collapse of the Universe has been disputed of late it looks unlikely that the Dr Edward Stone is unlikely to have his heinous mutilation of an apparently simple concept fixed for him by lucky happenstance.
So am I right in assuming that a fundamental disrespect for clear and effective communication is now de rigueur?
It's OK to display ignorance openly because everyone else says it is?
Bah, humbug.
Bookmarks