No. That can't be it. Because in the NZ electricty market, all generators get paid the cleared price of the highest cost generator on the system. If that one is one that has to buy carbon credits then that price is higher for all geneartors irrespective of fuel source.
Now that may sound like a win for Hydro generators, but it isn't. At the same time all retailers have to pay that same that same higher price, and that is passed on to the consumers. So there is no win and no loss for any of generators irrespective of fuel and there is no win and no loss for any of the retailers, it is only the consumer who suffers. Yes, even the consumers who live in the South Island and have only hydro plant still have to pay the increased costs due to ETS.
Last edited by Jantar; 1st July 2010 at 17:40.
Time to ride
Easy to blame the big polluters; who pollute to give you products at a lower price than from a non/lower polluter. Are you driven to buy cheap?
It is possible you don't know anyone who knows jack shit.
You seem to be onto it.
It may not be popular but is a step in the right direction. There are two options:
1) Tell most of the world to get fucked we are not going to do anything and don't care if we damage NZ image of 'clean green', nor do we care if we can't sell our primary produce overseas. This will probably mean the only motorbikes you will be able to afford are those cheap horrible things from China.
2) Regulate and introduce a range of carbon taxes to reduce carbon.
ETS sounds like the best option to me.
BTW: Labour and the Greens are on side. ACT are playing some weird game to keep in the news.
Here for the ride.
So yet again the consumer literally pays for the lack of business innovation, too much money going into private hands and not into real R&D... fuckin pathetic.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
So if I make my boys use the generator pushbike to charge our batteries and therefore disconnect us from the grid, and we pushbike everywhere, someone somewhere will pay me money?
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
Agreed, we think alike. I'm a rationalist probably with both green and liberal tendencies. I don't like pollution and hate the greenhouse anthropomorphic debate because it obscures the much bigger problem of finite resources and a finite planet. Too many people living in increasingly desperate conditions -Africa, Asia, and South America.
I think wind power is weak and only pursued because it is easy and visible. Tidal, hydro, and thermal power have much more to give us. IMHO New Zealand is too small for competing electricity generators and we would be far better off with a government operated national energy company. NZED anyone???
Nuclear fission has much to offer but if we bide our time others will produce a viable fusion technology. Let the Europeans do the experiments.In the meantime tidal and geothermal should be developed. We have one of the thinnest crusts in the world around Rotorua with magma just below the surface. We have a huge coastline with tides running twice a day - its a no-brainer. Tough technological challenge certainly but it can be done.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
yes built and adopted on the basis of the other global warming CO2 scam.
As I said in some other posts on another thread, its all about the money and we will be paying, and now hey looky looky whats happening.
Countries fucked mate, Im so tempted to leave, but to go where ?
Ive run out of fucks to give
It's a bit hard calling it a debate - on the one side you have scientists and on the other you have religious nut jobs, right wing extremists, a few oddball scientists and big business. It is seen as a debate because the deniers make the most noise and don't bother wasting their time on research when they can find typos in the IPCC reports and take a few stolen emails out of context.
Don't blame me, I voted Green.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I don't exactly agree Quasi but I'm not convinced about the ETS or carbon taxes either. None of these ideas were created by some dark cabal in New York to make money, but yes, traders will jump on the bandwagon if there is a dollar to be made. Then we need consultants, analysts, mathematicians, media advisors........so I can see why you might think there is an emperor's new clothes feel to the whole carbon market idea.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks