I got stopped at a full-on booze bus checkpoint last night. The po po was very nice to me, and I to him. middle aged, middle class white little fucker that I am.
I got stopped at a full-on booze bus checkpoint last night. The po po was very nice to me, and I to him. middle aged, middle class white little fucker that I am.
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
That many shit posts, I don't know where to start. I don't think the computer would handle all the multi quotes.
Police CAN'T, sorry I will say that again for the hard of reading CAN'T carry a taser as routine. The circumstances of the job MUST dictate the carriage.
Jeepers what would the posts be like if he had been tazed and the public thought he shouldn't have been?
Firearms,well where to begin. There are few cops that I believe could not hit the target with a M4. Just like in life some are better than others. Those that fail get retested and/or remedial training.
Glock, well some struggle fair enough. I have had people who are shit scared of the glock shooting fucken well after very little time.
An example of the popo bosses scared to ruffle the public feathers. Baddies cruising around with guns in car wanting to do bad things to each other.
Cops arm themselves. Told to take guns off, too frightening to public.
Lastly the baddies already have guns (lots of them) if one thinks that they don't think again.
Why is it that there are alot of countries that routinely carry but the yanks are always used as an example?
I don't have hair on my balls,
Hair doesn't grow on steel
Want this to happen to you?
Your right, that was a bit of a tirade and yes you still sound like a WL.
Who cares whether the deterant works, not the point of this thread (i might have it wrong), its about the right of the police to defend themselves by carring guns to which i am in all favour but it should be down to the police to decide if they do or not.
As to your above clap-trap i have seen many of doco's in regards to what works and what doen't and the only thing they have in common is the out come fuck all changes.
Take the last one i saw on the prison populations. They used (i think Sweden) as a subject and they were all "have to treat them with kid gloves and treat them nice, give them all they want" and at the end they had less people inside but the same crime rate and the same recidivist rate.
Lock them up, throw away the key or just plain put them down. who cares if it works at least they are off the streets and away from others that even if they don't respect the law at least they abide by them. if a few million people manage to go through life without being in trouble with the law why should we bow down to a pack of fuckwits who couldn't give a fly fuck about anything or body then themselves.
Yeah .. I might agree that tose wearing gang patches are likely to be criminals .. I don't think all crims wear gang patches ... I know that Jan Molenaar was not a patched member of any gang and I seriously doubt the two involved in the Chch shooting are patched members ...
You want to shoot all patched memebrs? Be my guest ..but dont complain when they start shooting back ... and don't expect that to solve the problem ... plenty of crims out there don't wear patches ..
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
Love it . that describes me to a T as well. I have become a middle class home owning fucker .. dunno how the hell that happened ... but hey, I'm alive, it's a sunny day and in six weeks I get my licence back and can ride again ...
Still haven't lost my radical politics tho' ...
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
Good one Boris ... You clearly don't give a flying fuck about anything or anybody but yourself ... just perpetrating (get a fucking dictionary and look the word up) the attitude ... don't you think that the violence in your language and attitude is expressed by people pulling guns? Don't you think there's a connection? (I, sorry, I shouild have realised - another fuckwit who couldn't ... )
I never suggested bowing down before them .. If you could actualy read and comprehend (yeah I know, men can't multi-task) I said they should be locked up .. and even shot ...
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
Wow, you must think a lot of yourself if you can ascertain the intelligence of a poster by a few posts (you can look those words up if you like), or that fact that they disagree with you, and if you think there is “violence” in those words than god knows what you think of most of the posters on KB.
Your right I don’t care about anybody but myself, family and friends just like everyone else. You don’t care about me and I don’t care about you, but that doesn’t mean I go around breaking into houses or do drugs or assaulting people or not care when it happens to other people.
The reason for this is I don’t think my life is any more important than the next persons just like theirs is not any more important than mine.
Everyone has the right to have a nice happy life free from people who do not want to abide by the laws of the land, and have the right to punish the perpetrators that choose not to.
Oh and before you have a go at someone’s reading and comprehension skills you should proof read what you have just written.
mayby police bikes could get an idea off this beast.
"We are not human beings having a spiritual experience. We are spiritual beings having a human experience."
Why fuck about with guns anway,the carpet bombing of a few select suburbs would improve life greatly for many.
Be the person your dog thinks you are...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks