Ok, before reading this, bear in mind I tend to support the right wing, and I'm probably making generalisations, but its a different view point.
Labour is for the people. National is for businesses. Labour screws businesses and tries to help the people. National helps businesses and screws the people (in a very basic view). But if Labour is in power and making the company spend huge on tax and compliance, then profits fall and people have to be laid off, or halt pay increases. v.v if the business is doing really well, then they want to expand and employ more people, or pay more.
So, to my way of thinking, if businesses are suffering then people suffer. If businesses do well, then people do well, so why not allow the businesses to do well?? Ok, obviously not everyone will follow that line (some will just take the profits) but in the end, they will probably end up spending it, probably to another business, hence the money go round and velocity of money...
That said, I'm a student and I want universal allowances even though they probably aren't financially viable. But I want them.
I also liked National's every year of work = one year wipe off of student loan (Labour called it slave labour)

Bookmarks