I read through the 1 minute pause called Directions that the AA put out, and in an article about road safety found this gem:
"There were about 43 motorcyclist deaths, of which motorcyclists themselves were responsible for 35. Car drivers were responsible for four".
For a start "about 43" deaths? Is their data collection so poor that they were unable to get an exact figure on motorcycle fatalities, yet were able to accurately attribute the exact number of deaths to bike riders and car drivers? Or are motorcyclists of such low value that nobody really knows how many die?
I know Katman probably believes that motorcyclists were responsible for 44 of the 43 deaths, but the good Prof Lamb's stats showed culpibility was pretty evenly divided between us and car drivers, and Prof Lamb doesn't use the word "about" in his research. Which is how come he's a professor, not some minimum wage journo working for AA.
The AA are an influential organisation with a lot of credibility, and you can guarantee that Mary Pajero and Andy Audi are reading this article and tsk tsking about all those mad, crazy bikers with a suicide wish. Unfortunately that means when we ask to be taken seriously regarding road safety, and when we demand that our rights as road users be respected they will say "you bring it on yourselves, don't come looking for sympathy or support".
Bookmarks