Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 79

Thread: Gear safety message

  1. #61
    Join Date
    8th January 2005 - 15:05
    Bike
    Triumph Speed Triple
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    10,283
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by phill-k View Post
    Otherwise the information is pure scaremongering and a part of the on going crap between the various second tier suppliers of riding gear as we have seen before.
    Not necessarily, it could be a worthwhile discussion if it raises awareness.

    Im not sure if this discussion relates to what might be called "second tier". I have a Spidi textile jacket which has a foam insert in the back. The armour in the shoulders and elbows is more substantial than what's in the back, but I am aware of the shortcomings of the back armour.

    I have a Spidi leather jacket with optional back protector. This is more robust, but is still nowhere near as good as a "strap on" back protector.

    None of the foregoing should be construed as negative criticism, I have other expensive gear that appears to offer less crash protection, although better weather protection.

    As always, security is a trade-off against convenience. We could all get around looking like Bibendum (the "Michelin man") but that wouldn't be very convenient and certainly not cool...

    Anyhoo I'm too old to worry about being cool

  2. #62
    Join Date
    30th July 2006 - 20:48
    Bike
    1999 yamaha R1
    Location
    WHAKATANE
    Posts
    427
    Quote Originally Posted by Virago View Post
    Wow. Are those two mates in wheelchairs as the direct result of using inferior back-protectors?
    What a cheeky cunt. I'm with Quasi. All he's trying to do is stop some new-bie from buying a "foam" back protector thinking that it will actually perform like a real B.P.
    A nice Pit

  3. #63
    Join Date
    13th May 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    Thinking
    Location
    Around
    Posts
    7,383
    Quote Originally Posted by saltydog View Post
    What a cheeky cunt. I'm with Quasi. All he's trying to do is stop some new-bie from buying a "foam" back protector thinking that it will actually perform like a real B.P.
    Basically, but we are on KB and there are long term plonkers that like the bagging of anyone with a profile................its a kiwi thing
    Ive run out of fucks to give

  4. #64
    Join Date
    29th December 2007 - 08:19
    Bike
    gsf600s k2
    Location
    Putaruru
    Posts
    273
    Usually I have doubted the motives of Quasi in these threads, but this time even I can see it for what it is. A genuine concern for the safety of others. It has certainly made me take a closer look at that piece of foam in the back of my jacket.

    Thank you Quasi for the warning.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    13th January 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Honda PC800
    Location
    Henderson -auckland
    Posts
    14,163
    A bit of a history lesson from Ye awd days. Way back when back protectors were unheard of for racers let alone road riders. Then someone noticed that competition HORSE riders were starting to wear the dual density foam back protectors.
    We started to use these before it became a legal requirement to wear em for racing.
    So technically they are "back protectors".
    I'd argue the toss with Quasi on the "they are useless" front because they do offer some protection in an impact crash and having er "kissed the tarmac" in a then current set of Scarletti leathers with one of those foam protectors It did make a definite difference.

    That all said --technlogy has moved a heck of a long way forwards since the 80's and
    The level of body protection available with modern armour is amazing --You'd be a fool not to take advantage of it
    To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?

  6. #66
    Join Date
    13th May 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    Thinking
    Location
    Around
    Posts
    7,383
    Quote Originally Posted by FROSTY View Post
    I'd argue the toss with Quasi on the "they are useless" front because they do offer some protection in an impact crash and having er "kissed the tarmac"
    you can but youd be wrong.

    The fact you kissed the tarmac is not good but you didnt hurt your back as you clearly didnt impact it hard.........low slide maybe
    did a bike crash into your back, did you crash into a curb ?

    Back Protectors are NOT made of sleeping Matt foam, and they do require some technology and testing to become a Back Protector.
    Ive run out of fucks to give

  7. #67
    Join Date
    13th January 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Honda PC800
    Location
    Henderson -auckland
    Posts
    14,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Quasievil View Post
    you can but youd be wrong.

    The fact you kissed the tarmac is not good but you didnt hurt your back as you clearly didnt impact it hard.........low slide maybe
    did a bike crash into your back, did you crash into a curb ?

    Back Protectors are NOT made of sleeping Matt foam, and they do require some technology and testing to become a Back Protector.
    No you're apsolutely right I only slid over a "ripple" strip (corrogated concrete edge of castrol) on my back then had the bike that caused the crash hit me in my back and run up and punch my lid into the ground. so yea it was a gentle crash by all accounts. Mind you this was 20 years ago when men were men and I was 10 feet tall and bulletproof.
    Ive still got the darned leathers round here somewheres complete with tyre mark.
    To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?

  8. #68
    Join Date
    13th May 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    Thinking
    Location
    Around
    Posts
    7,383
    Quote Originally Posted by FROSTY View Post
    No you're apsolutely right I only slid over a "ripple" strip (corrogated concrete edge of castrol) on my back then had the bike that caused the crash hit me in my back and run up and punch my lid into the ground. so yea it was a gentle crash by all accounts. Mind you this was 20 years ago when men were men and I was 10 feet tall and bulletproof.
    Ive still got the darned leathers round here somewheres complete with tyre mark.
    Okay, so your message then is dont wear back protectors, wear foam and you will be fine because amazingly for you after being hit in the back by a bike youre ok so everyone else will be to?
    Good one Frosty
    Ive run out of fucks to give

  9. #69
    Join Date
    29th December 2007 - 08:19
    Bike
    gsf600s k2
    Location
    Putaruru
    Posts
    273
    Quote Originally Posted by FROSTY View Post
    No you're apsolutely right I only slid over a "ripple" strip (corrogated concrete edge of castrol) on my back then had the bike that caused the crash hit me in my back and run up and punch my lid into the ground. so yea it was a gentle crash by all accounts. Mind you this was 20 years ago when men were men and I was 10 feet tall and bulletproof.
    Ive still got the darned leathers round here somewheres complete with tyre mark.
    So all in all just a bit of an oopps moment ?

  10. #70
    Join Date
    13th January 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Honda PC800
    Location
    Henderson -auckland
    Posts
    14,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Quasievil View Post
    Okay, so your message then is dont wear back protectors, wear foam and you will be fine because amazingly for you after being hit in the back by a bike youre ok so everyone else will be to?
    Good one Frosty
    NOPE--show me anywhere I said that?? YOU are making a sweeping statement that dual density foam in bike gear offers no impact protection.
    Do I feel that a propper back protecter is a good idea to be worn YES
    Do I feel that dual density foam offers no impact protection NO
    To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?

  11. #71
    Join Date
    3rd December 2004 - 15:05
    Bike
    none...I gota sail boat
    Location
    athenree
    Posts
    850
    Quote Originally Posted by FROSTY View Post
    I was 10 feet tall.
    dude...you have never been ten feet tall....5 foot 8 at a pinch...
    Hater of haters since 2012

  12. #72
    Join Date
    10th December 2005 - 12:19
    Bike
    Hodor
    Location
    Hodor
    Posts
    2,028
    Quote Originally Posted by stify View Post
    dude...you have never been ten feet tall....5 foot 8 at a pinch...
    stifman long time no see

  13. #73
    Join Date
    13th January 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Honda PC800
    Location
    Henderson -auckland
    Posts
    14,163
    Just to be clear here folks in NO way am I advocating not wearing a seperate QUALITY back protector when out for a ride.
    Going back in time we used what was available to us. Nowadays there is no excuse.
    To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?

  14. #74
    Join Date
    3rd December 2004 - 15:05
    Bike
    none...I gota sail boat
    Location
    athenree
    Posts
    850
    Quote Originally Posted by Scouse View Post
    stifman long time no see
    for sure...hiding in the bay of plenty these days...might catch ya on a coro run come summer time
    Hater of haters since 2012

  15. #75
    Join Date
    10th December 2005 - 12:19
    Bike
    Hodor
    Location
    Hodor
    Posts
    2,028
    Quote Originally Posted by stify View Post
    for sure...hiding in the bay of plenty these days...might catch ya on a coro run come summer time
    I fookin hope so

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •