"There must be a one-to-one correspondence between left and right parentheses, with each left parenthesis to the left of its corresponding right parenthesis."
Where is the stat that give the ratio of vehicles owned and driven per head of population od each contry mentioned.
We may have one of the higest incident rates, But when you put it in proprotion to the ownership it changes.
4 .5 mill kiwis own 5 mill cars.
4.5 mill newyork city dwellers own 1.5 mill cars
Britten has a low incerdent per population head of vehicle incidents, but vehicle ownerdhip in britten per population head is only 1/16 of ours
That one comparison alone shows the stats to be false by perspective
To be old and wise, first you must be young and stupid.
Have you driven on british roads?
The sheer amount of cars is astounding. When i came over here i was astonished by how few cars were on the road - and hence if id been told these statistics then i wouldve been shocked. But having been here 5 years now, its no suprise.
Though I am suprised britain comes out on top. wtf. I suppose our training and licensing is better, roads are better, and a lot of young cnuts cant afford cars as insurance is so expensive (mandatory)
That's the way the stats are presented. Per head of poulation Brittain is 24 places better than us. Per billion km travelled Brittain is 14 places better than us.
Our stats are nothing to be proud of, but they do show that the enforcement methods used in New Zealand are not dealing with the major causes of accidents: inattention, fatigue, intersection behaviour, road design, training. Instead our enforcement is aimed mainly at the revenue sources of speed and seatbelt use, and the anti alcohol message.
Time to ride
This the result you get when the authorities think they can reduce the road toll and make a buck at the same time and that teaching drivers to drive well makes for "overconfident drivers"
the worst drivers in the world are all in high toxo infection regions
I'm completely with you on the second part, but I think your first statement is misinformed. While the difference changes from 24 places to 14 places, statistics are not available per billion k's traveled in ten of the 33 countries. Were those statistics available, the placing difference would probably be significantly larger for the deaths per k's traveled. See page 9 of the original stats.
For any interested, full stats are here:
http://www.internationaltransportfor...09-15IRTAD.pdf
Some interesting reading. Nicely laid out. Also discusses motorcycle statistics separately. It's interesting to see that NZ is one of only 5 of the 33 countries which had an increase in the road toll from 2008 to 2009. To be honest though, my suspicion is that we have a relatively small sample size (smaller population) and so variance plays a much larger part. This can be seen by the extent the road toll fluctuates here each year.
Library Schooled
Fucking asian drivers eh?
Agreed 100%
Yeah I mostly agree with this too.
Sorry, but I don't think this will make much difference. Those that drive drunk currently are already breaking the law. All your doing is penalising those that have 1 or 2 drinks. It's like increased gun control laws. All your doing is penalising those that follow the law.
Yeah I think they are pretty ineffective tools. I know I slow where I know there is one, and then resume my normal pace. This might be 55km/h in a 50 zone or xxxkm/h in a 100 zone.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks