WD doesn't say what the green drives performance are, but we all pretty much know they run at 5400rpm.
Since you have brought up Seagate, it depends on whether that 500GB drive is a (now) infamous seagate 11. On top of that, any new drive is going to perform better than an old one.
Originally Posted by Jane Omorogbe from UK MSN on the KTM990SM
I've used the Ubuntu disk performance benchmark, and HDTach, and I have found that the WD drive is only slightly slower in the read/write department than the 500GB Seagate, but the seek time is around 20ms with the WD and around 13ms with the Seagate. My guess is that since the WD isn't always operating at its full speed, it's slow when it comes down to day to day running, but quick when reading or writing large amounts of data.
My 320GB SATA Seagate 7200RPM drive is very slow, it has a read rate of around 67MB/s, compared with around 92MB/s for the 500GB model. However, the write speed is around the same for both the Seagate drives. My guess is that the 320GB drive is on its last legs.
Has anyone here got a solid state SATA drive that they have benchmarked, just so I can see the performance difference between a SSD and a disk drive?
This link seems to have a few benchmarks:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/3734/s...od-hybrid-hdd/
...and I don't wanna die, just want to ride my motorcy...cle (Arlo Guthrie)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks