Good ol' Jacko got off.

[2_SL0]

I agree with Biff and Paul, but does anyone know if the family can now pursue a
civil case against him, or can we all say $$$$$. I believed thats what happened in 1994, he settled the civil case with a payout purely tobring it all to a quick end, likely to be the cheaper option. Im know MJ fan, but I dont feel he neccessarily did these things. He sure is a nut, just may not be that flavour nut.

[El Dopa]

In both cases guilt is attached by way on inuendo. While the public may wish to attest Jackson's guilt one way or another I am of the opinion a judicial system should declare guilt or innocence on the evidence placed before it.

The jury have declared that 'the mother ' is not credible and as such can not be believed. I hold that is also equally true for Jackson for reasons stated elswhere in the forum.

In both our's and the American judicial system a not guilty verdict 'is' a statement of innocence.

Skyryder

Good points. I withdraw my earlier comment about his guilt.