Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
The presence of a firearm does not stop a cop making mistakes - as they did in all those cases. Its far more complex than what you and imdying suggest.
All I am saying is if a cop wants to carry a firearm to help with the choices they have for protecting themselves against the shit in society, then let them.
Out of interest why havent cops here worn handguns for years?Whos responsible for them not being armed and anyone know what the reasons are for not arming them.
Be the person your dog thinks you are...
well that is the soft cock, limp wristed,,PC bullshit blame everyone else for them being criminals answer that I excepted.
What a complete load of bollocks you spout.
As for Sweden, they have the same offending rate as here and they are more soft cock so that doesn't work.
Saudi is more police state than the USA so thats why they have a lower crime rate and that's the way it should be but i could just imagine what you would all say if we started cutting off the hands of thieves, have a good stoning or God forbid we take the benefit off them
like Smiffy said some people just think they are entitled to.
In the early 80's the then-commisioner decided that senior cops (detectives, sergeants and senior sergeants) could not carry firearms during their normal duties (night shift d's almost always carried)
this policy has remained pretty much in force, however most section sergeants, seniors and dog handlers now carry a pistol during the hours of darkness, and certainly in some areas that would be considered high risk.
in 2003/4 I was tooled up (much to my father's disgust) pretty much on any shift except early shift - i always had a holster on though, and a glock in a floor safe under my feet
and in 1991, my s/sgt was comfortable with our decision to carry or not on night shift, in a single-man i-car, based in Huntly. I always carried. Pulled it out in anger twice. to extremely good effect too i must add.
interestingly, imho the carriage of firearms is a management issue, not a governance one - I believe the govt does not have the mandate to say 'can't be done/must be done'
Geez you're hillarious.Without reading all of the thread so far...,
He is of the hated highway patrol... the very thing some on here hate with abundance, "coz I got a ticket once... or 17 times, coz I'm a real slow leaner dumbfuck..." type of thing.![]()
In his 35 years as a traffic/cop, never been assaulted.
Bloody top bloke too, worked with him for a short time in Waiouru.
but thats it in a nutshell isn't it, the cops are doing there job and very well indeed, its the courts that let these tossers back out into society. just today i heard that dick that shot at the cops got 2 years, WTF?
All the cops on here would be able to testify to the shit sentences handed out on a daily basis by slack arsed judges and then when some one does hand out a good one it goes to appeal and gets shortened, or the dicks that have pages of history and still get bail.
IMHO if we start throwing away the key and letting these scum rot away in jail the better we will be. no problem of reoffending as they don't get let out, and it will cost about the same as having to provide the dole and legal aid.
Agreed,the drink driving thing is a prime example,the money/resources etc that goes into catching them must be huge but pick up a paper in any major center the day after court day and you will find people on 6th and upwards convictions still get little more than a slap,fucking pathetic,they piss about with probation officers reports blah blah blah and come up with some so called extenuating (spell) circumstancesfuck me whats having an old man with an anger problem got to do with driving pissed.Coppers must shake there heads in disbelief.
Be the person your dog thinks you are...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks