and know a bit about survey design. I believ that this survey is a complete waste of time as it will not produce any valid data.
and know a bit about survey design. I believ that this survey is a complete waste of time as it will not produce any valid data.
Don't blame me, I voted Green.
This is usually the case when a survey is designed to answer a question somebody already thinks they have the answer to.
What scares the fuck out of me is that the media uses the Candor Trust and anything associated with them as a semi-credible reference.
It's a bit like grabbing a Lorem Ipsum and pretending it's Latin.
I just had a look at their website - I can't for the life of me see how anyone could take them seriously. They make a brazillian claims and list all kinds of statistics without any referencing at all.
Did you know that 88.76% of male motorcyclists have bigger gentlemen's sausages than car drivers? And that 75.54 of internet users with the username Shrub are irresistable to the opposite sex, and in 95.42% of cases where they are also motorcyclists they are incredibly good riders?
Don't blame me, I voted Green.
Yeah . me too .. it took me several times to read each question to get what they wanted - it's poorly written. And several times I wanted to tick more than one option but could not - it's crap ...
I filled it in as a runner (nearly twenty years ago ...) That was fun.
I thought the intent of the questions was quite good ... because, as a runner, harsher penalties would not have deterred me (If you get away there is no penalty ...)
You need to get into the mind of the offenders - and, (without apologies) none of the wankers here demanding the death penalty for graffitti have been there ... (or the bullshit artists who will take issue with that sentence) ...
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks