Jeans was 1 simple example, me leaving the tap on for 10 seconds to get cold water 5 times a day likely wastes litres of water, so I am guilty too. My main concern is product by-product. My waste is just warm water, theirs isn't. If the water table is tainted and is affected by the chemicals in the jeans, the dyes etc... and then dumped to soak in to the land, you may not only shaft the local water supply, you could also shaft the land... I can't find answers to those questions... wonder if anyone has actually researched it beyond testing the local water table once a month...
@ eco-marketing... these are not the droids you're looking for
. If i can find the doicument i'll post it... wouldn;t you say that 1800 litres for 1 pair of jeans was excessive... propoganda aside?




@ eco-marketing... these are not the droids you're looking for
. If i can find the doicument i'll post it... wouldn;t you say that 1800 litres for 1 pair of jeans was excessive... propoganda aside?
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Reply With Quote
... I remember as a kid (late 70's) watching the news and seeing frazzled forests accompanied with an acid rain warning as a funny coloured cloud crossed from the east... coulda been propoganda I suppose, but the trees were fooked.
... they only ever seem to move on to the next latest and greatest chemical that hasn't been banned, with pretty much the same results...
... In 1950 there were 200,000 bee keepers, in 2007 there were less than 1000. In 1980 there were 4.5 million hives, by 1990 there were 3 million. Since then the decline has slowed dramatically, but it's estimated that by 2035 there will be no bees left in the US at all. Some of the reasons given was travel stress, a Japanese mite, pesticide spraying... but essentially they can't put their finger on any single cause...
, but time is money, why sort through the fish when it wastes fishing time 
Bookmarks