Why the fuck do I have to paying a letting fee to a letting agent, the bastards charge 1 weeks rent and are cheeky enough to add GST.
I'm looking for a place in the city. Found a 1000 pw 3 bedroom place. Costs to move in are as follows. 2 weeks rent advance, 4 weeks bond and 1 weeks rent for letting agent plus GST. totaling 7150!
I told the agent he ain't getting the 1150 letting fee as he only answered my trade me query and spent 15min showing me the property, he can raise it with the property manager as he effectively did his job and is something I shouldn't be paying for. We argued for a bit and he said he'll come back to me. He did and said he can't waive it, I told him to go fuck himself and may he look forward to many more months of no rental income.
So here is what I don't understand.
-Potential tenants don't want to pay letting fees
-Property owners want no vacancies in their properties as even 1 week loss of rental income can be substantial.
-Letting agents and property managers usually work for same firms
-It seems by having a letting fee the property managers and letting agents have more of an incentive for high tenant turnover vs. solid long term tenants as every time a new tenant moves in they'll receive a letting fee (1 weeks rent for fuck all work) rather than charging a continuous property management fee of 8% pw (industry average). Not good for property owners.
So for that place I was looking at they would receive 1000*52*0.08=4160 a year as property fees provided the tenant stay for a whole year. Property owner gets 52000-4160 = 47,840.
Now say they have 4 tenants during the year and had about 10 weeks of no rental income as they were looking for new tenants. That means they collected 4k in letting fees and 42*1000*0.08 = 3,360 in property management. Total revenue of 7,360. Property owner gets 42,000 - 3360 =38,640.
Doesn't make sense, they make more money when the property owner makes less. Cheeky fuckin bastards!
Rant over.
Bookmarks