Is helmet size really such a big issue?
Most people agree it's dangerous to wear a helmet that is too big, on the face of it this seems like good advice - you don't want your head rattling round in there right? But I got to thinking about it the other day..... say you have two riders (let's call them Bert and Ernie) who are wearing the same helmet except Bert's helmet fits perfectly and Ernie's helmet is a couple of sizes too big. Bert and Ernie are out for a ride and (shock horror) are not riding in staggered formation but instead precisely side by side. At the same moment Bert and Ernie T bone a cage that has driven through a stop sign and both go flying over the bonnet at precisely the same tragectory. Both land head first on the road the same distance from the cage. So what's the difference? They both receive the same benefits of the couple of cm of cusioning goodness from the helmet interior etc, the only difference being that the Ernie's helmet impacts the road a couple of mm's before his head hit's the inside of the helmet.
Is it really enough to make a difference? Or is the correct size issue more to do with other stuff such as strap fitting? Am I missing the point completely?
Last edited by bert_is_evil; 3rd March 2008 at 14:35.
Reason: spellin no gud
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be quoted out of context, then used against you.
Bookmarks