is this person actually an offender or is he the accused
if they are only accused then shut the **** up, they are innocent until proven guilty
having been in a similar situation and having my name out in the media claiming I had done many things that I had not was not a pleasant sensation, especially when the person putting my name into the media hid behind a psuedonom
+1, there was a murder case in the UK recently - the victims landlord was questioned by the police - media splashed his name and details all over the 5 O´clock news - guilty by media. He was a bit weird looking and they made the most of it, if they hadn't found the real killer his life would have been ruined.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...r-2172089.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ed-murder.html
I love the smell of twin V16's in the morning..
And I to my motorcycle parked like the soul of the junkyard. Restored, a bicycle fleshed with power, and tore off. Up Highway 106 continually drunk on the wind in my mouth. Wringing the handlebar for speed, wild to be wreckage forever.
- James Dickey, Cherrylog Road.
This name suppression is shyte. The offender is awaiting sentence therefore he has had his chance to tell whom so ever he needs to. The judge needs their head read!
Number 1 I get an understanding of you anger but suspect now is a time for you to try to step back and change directions. I know that sounds trite but if you buy too far into the victim process this fucker will own you for life.
post content removed to Protect the guilty)
So I can challenge a name suppression legally. Any advice?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks