Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 171

Thread: Fukushima nuclear plant explosion

  1. #1
    Join Date
    3rd May 2005 - 11:51
    Bike
    XR200
    Location
    Invercargill - Arrowtn
    Posts
    1,395

    Fukushima nuclear plant explosion

    Shag. On TV there is footage of one of the reactors exploding. It looks like the containment building has been breached which means radioactive dust is being released into the local environment.

    Its like Chernobyl but with live coverage.

    Sky channel 96

  2. #2
    Join Date
    30th August 2006 - 21:44
    Bike
    Triple Delight
    Location
    Mangakino
    Posts
    7,040
    Oh dear GOD! Too much! Those poor people.
    Quote Originally Posted by Gubb View Post
    Nonono,

    He rides the Leprachhaun at the end of the Rainbow. Usually goes by the name Anne McMommus

  3. #3
    Join Date
    1st October 2005 - 21:01
    Bike
    A Blade or two
    Location
    West Coast
    Posts
    531
    Bloody hell, Could it get any worse for the poor buggers.
    SOME PEOPLE ARE LIKE SLINKIES - NOT REALLY GOOD FOR ANYTHING BUT THEY
    BRING A SMILE TO YOUR FACE WHEN PUSHED DOWN THE STAIRS.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    6th May 2008 - 14:15
    Bike
    She resents being called a bike
    Location
    Wellllie
    Posts
    1,494
    Blog Entries
    3
    We just got back from the rugby and saw it... did you see the arced shockwave bursting upwards... looked like a very violent explosion. Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse, poor buggas
    I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    3rd May 2005 - 11:51
    Bike
    XR200
    Location
    Invercargill - Arrowtn
    Posts
    1,395
    My guess is the containment building has been breached from the build-up of water pressure around the reactor. That has resulted in radioactive dust and smoke being released into the environment.

    The problem with this reactor is that the electrical pumps failed after the earthquake despite backups, so the flow of cooling water around the reactor stopped flowing. The reactor automatically shut-down but that doesn't stop or release the heat already in the pile.

    There are positives: only one of four reactors at Fukushima has failed. Japanese authorities have been evacuating people over the past 24 hours. The danger is from radioactive dust, not from any sort of atomic bomb explosion. Its possible there won't be a melt-down of the core which can still be cooled if the engineers can get water flowing. Damned dangerous work though.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    25th June 2007 - 21:21
    Bike
    S1000RR
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    6,988
    Fucking hell...


    If you can make it on Kiwibiker you can make it anywhere.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    17th April 2006 - 05:39
    Bike
    Various things
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    14,429
    So all of the fuckheads that were/are against wind turbines because they're an eyesore...what would you rather have?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    3rd May 2005 - 11:51
    Bike
    XR200
    Location
    Invercargill - Arrowtn
    Posts
    1,395
    Quote Originally Posted by Crasherfromwayback View Post
    So all of the fuckheads that were/are against wind turbines because they're an eyesore...what would you rather have?
    Umm...actually counter-intuitive as it must seem, I'm still in favour of nulear power. This Fukushima reactor is a 40 year old Westinghouse which is known as old and a bad design. It has had safety features added but clearly they were defeated by this massive earthquake.

    The new reactors are far better designed. Japan has a lot of reactors and this is the only one which has failed. Provided the public are evacuated - which has been going on for 24 hours - they are safe.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    6th May 2008 - 14:15
    Bike
    She resents being called a bike
    Location
    Wellllie
    Posts
    1,494
    Blog Entries
    3
    I thought a shutdown caused the nuclear material to be removed from the fusion chamber? Is this the bit that failed?
    I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    3rd May 2005 - 11:51
    Bike
    XR200
    Location
    Invercargill - Arrowtn
    Posts
    1,395
    Update - wind is blowing east from Fukushima out to sea. That is the prevailing wind direction and the reason Japanese nuclear plants are built on the east coasts of Japan. So hopefully most of the radioactive dust and steam will blow away to sea.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    24th July 2006 - 11:53
    Bike
    KTM 1290 SAR
    Location
    Wgtn
    Posts
    5,541
    Quote Originally Posted by mashman View Post
    I thought a shutdown caused the nuclear material to be removed from the fusion chamber? Is this the bit that failed?
    No, the reaction stopped automatically when the quake hit, the latent heat in the surounding mass is still there, though.

    What failed was the cooling system, and it's backup. The third tier backup was designed to last for just a few hours, enough to buy time and to minimise damage in any subsequent containment breach.
    Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon

  12. #12
    Join Date
    17th April 2006 - 05:39
    Bike
    Various things
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    14,429
    Quote Originally Posted by Winston001 View Post
    Umm...actually counter-intuitive as it must seem, I'm still in favour of nulear power. This Fukushima reactor is a 40 year old Westinghouse which is known as old and a bad design. It has had safety features added but clearly they were defeated by this massive earthquake.

    The new reactors are far better designed. Japan has a lot of reactors and this is the only one which has failed. Provided the public are evacuated - which has been going on for 24 hours - they are safe.
    Shit hot!

    My self personally...I'd rather try and dodge spinning blades than radioactive fallout after /during a big shake. Either way...best wishes to Japan. Mega bad buzz.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    6th May 2008 - 14:15
    Bike
    She resents being called a bike
    Location
    Wellllie
    Posts
    1,494
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Ocean1 View Post
    No, the reaction stopped automatically when the quake hit, the latent heat in the surounding mass is still there, though.

    What failed was the cooling system, and it's backup. The third tier backup was designed to last for just a few hours, enough to buy time and to minimise damage in any subsequent containment breach.
    so the coolant heated, turned to steam and blew the place apart?
    I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    9th August 2005 - 19:52
    Bike
    CBR450RR
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    6,368
    Blog Entries
    77
    That was a hell of an explosion.

    There's enough heat in a scrammed reactor to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. If they recombine, that's a hell of an explosion.

    When an emergency shutdown of a reactor takes place the graphite control rods or whatever they're using drop into place. The nuclear material doesn't go anywhere, it stays where it is until it's used up. The control rods soak up all the stray protons etc (ie the beta radiation) and that stops the reactor from starting a chain reaction. The damn thing is still friggin hot though so the cooling systems need to be running to get rid of the heat, otherwise it just gets hotter and hotter until things start to melt. Then bad shit happens.
    Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem

    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity

  15. #15
    Join Date
    3rd May 2005 - 11:51
    Bike
    XR200
    Location
    Invercargill - Arrowtn
    Posts
    1,395
    Quote Originally Posted by mashman View Post
    so the coolant heated, turned to steam and blew the place apart?
    Yes. Not quite that straight-forward but essentially right.

    The reactor core is a sealed system running water or liquid sodium around the radioactive centre. Outside that is the containment vessel which has low-pressure flowing water which picks up the heat from the sealed system. It is essential for this water to keep flowing because it removes heat (it turns into steam) and drives a generator. It keeps the reactor sealed system cool and safe.

    Outside all of that is the containment building which is supposed to keep any steam leaks in.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •