Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 75

Thread: Rule changes for F4

  1. #46
    Join Date
    21st August 2008 - 21:52
    Bike
    suzuki RM125S 1975
    Location
    auckland
    Posts
    208

    TS100 piston

    Quote Originally Posted by speedpro View Post
    Dave makes some good points though I wouldn't be too annoyed about everyone getting to use KT pistons without the cost. I have a few bits I could use to make more engines myself. It isn't the oversize so much as the extra revs using those pistons allow that I'm hesitant about.
    Looking back I used to replace the piston in my TS100 every two meetings with another RG400 piston. That added up pretty quickly.
    The only reason I'm using the KT piston now is for more revs. The MB pistons, or TKRJ, all last well and the cost spread over 4-5-6 years is neglibible. FYI - the MB pistons are good for a reliable 13,000rpm and the rings will only lose a tip now and then over 14,000rpm.

    That does look a bit like I don't want anyone else getting to use the pistons I'm using.
    fitting a new piston in your ts100 every 2 meetings,did you run any oil,my RG50 did 13500 rpm and piston would do a years racing ,the rules are ok as they are people just need to build motors that last longer,as none of mega HP two strokes are winning jack.

  2. #47
    Join Date
    20th October 2010 - 20:59
    Bike
    Rg50 Fxr's150
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    441
    Blog Entries
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by richban View Post
    I think riding, weight, handling, and HP win races. But torque is good when you don't have some of the other bits.
    Horse power may help at the bigger tracks, which is what high hp 2t's need to stretch there legs. Most of big hp 2t's at Mt welly are short shifting gears and don't get into the high hp apart from the front straight. The average rider, like myself, on a short circuit, needs a fat spread of power on a bike that handles. I know of 6 guys at the moment who are working on 2t's with only low to mid 20's power and all want it fat like a 4 stroke.

  3. #48
    Join Date
    17th November 2002 - 11:00
    Bike
    XB12R, FXR150, Ducati 400ss, 1125CR
    Location
    dam.. i move too much
    Posts
    5,047
    Quote Originally Posted by Yow Ling View Post
    but its carbs are probably illegal so you should vote for options 2 and 2a
    they are also std...


    what a ride so far!!!!

  4. #49
    Join Date
    30th November 2005 - 18:27
    Bike
    TZFXR150, R1150GS, DRZ400, Ninja300 prod
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    1,811
    Quote Originally Posted by ajturbo View Post
    they are also std...
    ......yet illegal Mr Turbo


    Its harder to lose weight than gain horsepower.

  5. #50
    Join Date
    26th April 2006 - 12:52
    Bike
    Several
    Location
    Hutt Valley
    Posts
    5,125
    Quote Originally Posted by Gigglebutton View Post
    Horse power may help at the bigger tracks, which is what high hp 2t's need to stretch there legs. Most of big hp 2t's at Mt welly are short shifting gears and don't get into the high hp apart from the front straight. The average rider, like myself, on a short circuit, needs a fat spread of power on a bike that handles. I know of 6 guys at the moment who are working on 2t's with only low to mid 20's power and all want it fat like a 4 stroke.
    I'm another, low to mid 20's are a long way off yet though.
    Heinz Varieties

  6. #51
    Join Date
    17th November 2002 - 11:00
    Bike
    XB12R, FXR150, Ducati 400ss, 1125CR
    Location
    dam.. i move too much
    Posts
    5,047
    Quote Originally Posted by Buddha#81 View Post
    ......yet illegal Mr Turbo
    by how much..??


    what a ride so far!!!!

  7. #52
    Join Date
    25th March 2004 - 17:22
    Bike
    RZ496/Street 765RS/GasGas/ etc etc
    Location
    Wellington. . ok the hutt
    Posts
    21,206
    Blog Entries
    2
    So my point is people are already using KT pistons. Do we have to make them go down the offset crankpin (not cheap to get one of those made accurately) &/or re machine crank position? 35hp? Lets be fair, no one much had more than 20hp till recently maybe mid 20s & Nigels bike was a stand out at 27. 2.2cc will make every 100 a 35hp bike?! Yeah right.
    Don't you look at my accountant.
    He's the only one I've got.

  8. #53
    Join Date
    7th September 2009 - 09:47
    Bike
    Yo momma
    Location
    Podunk USA
    Posts
    4,561
    [QUOTE=Gigglebutton;1130034351]Horse power may help at the bigger tracks, which is what high hp 2t's need to stretch there legs. Most of big hp 2t's at Mt welly are short shifting gears and don't get into the high hp apart from the front straight. QUOTE]

    That is because most if not all of the recient big HP 2 strokes are really really really peaky, just have a look at the posted dyno curves.

    Quote Originally Posted by F5 Dave View Post
    In a similar vein that the recently changed F4 restriction for 150cc 4 strokes was increased to more oversizes (158.09cc) it is suggested that the current 104cc restriction is increased to 106.2cc. [/FONT]
    When was this done?
    Are you talking about the change from 145cc which was the original rule made to allow GL145's in? If this is what you are referring to then that rule change was mostly to allow FXR150's in which revived (saved) buckets.

  9. #54
    Join Date
    25th March 2004 - 17:22
    Bike
    RZ496/Street 765RS/GasGas/ etc etc
    Location
    Wellington. . ok the hutt
    Posts
    21,206
    Blog Entries
    2
    No I mean quite recently there was an amendment that gave the 150s a few more oversize CC out to 158 from perhaps 155 (can't remember specific numbers).


    [edit] from MNZ site here is what it is now

    F4
    2 stroke 55-100cc - 104cc
    2 stroke 55-125cc air cooled - 130.5cc
    4 stroke 55-150cc – 158.09cc

    Gives 150s 8cc to do whatever they like with, whereas 100s get 4cc & by percentage doesn't help much, we are talking available oversize pistons.
    Don't you look at my accountant.
    He's the only one I've got.

  10. #55
    Join Date
    7th September 2009 - 09:47
    Bike
    Yo momma
    Location
    Podunk USA
    Posts
    4,561
    Quote Originally Posted by F5 Dave View Post
    No I mean quite recently there was an amendment that gave the 150s a few more oversize CC out to 158 from perhaps 155 (can't remember specific numbers).


    [edit] from MNZ site here is what it is now

    F4
    2 stroke 55-100cc - 104cc
    2 stroke 55-125cc air cooled - 130.5cc
    4 stroke 55-150cc – 158.09cc

    Gives 150s 8cc to do whatever they like with, whereas 100s get 4cc & by percentage doesn't help much, we are talking available oversize pistons.
    Thanks for the clarification.

  11. #56
    Join Date
    20th November 2002 - 11:00
    Bike
    SW-125R(F4-TF125), ZXRD400, RD250LC
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand,
    Posts
    5,963
    Blog Entries
    36
    I'm lov ing the 'only $160' type comments. I wish I had that sort of money to spare. There's a reason I have 5 TF engines sitting on my bench doing nothing.

    I still think the KT piston is a fair and reasonable thing. You still have to spend money to get 30hp just like now. But for those without money - they get to keep their bikes running at a reasonable price.

    How did the 158cc oversize rule go though? Did anyone here know of it BEFORE it was done?

    Seems some can change rules without consultation and others can't even get a reply to an official rule change request.

  12. #57
    Join Date
    20th October 2010 - 20:59
    Bike
    Rg50 Fxr's150
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    441
    Blog Entries
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by koba View Post
    I'm another, low to mid 20's are a long way off yet though.
    Get speed pro to have a look at your motor. He and Tee Zee have helped me loads

  13. #58
    Join Date
    30th September 2008 - 09:31
    Bike
    Suzuki GP125 Bucket
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,969
    Quote Originally Posted by Skunk View Post
    Seems some can change rules without consultation and others can't even get a reply to an official rule change request.
    TeeZee after prompting on this forum has tried several times to get clarification on his carb modification by writing to MNZ, but has had no reply either.

  14. #59
    Join Date
    20th July 2010 - 07:56
    Bike
    RS/KE125, PW50
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,305
    Quote Originally Posted by Skunk View Post
    I wish I had that sort of money to spare. There's a reason I have 5 TF engines sitting on my bench doing nothing. .
    Thats odd, what I see is "I have 5 TF's sitting on my bench thats why I dont have that sort of money to spare". Sell the TF's

  15. #60
    Join Date
    17th February 2008 - 17:10
    Bike
    gp125 rg50 rs125hybrid
    Location
    Helensville
    Posts
    2,882
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Skunk View Post
    I'm lov ing the 'only $160' type comments. I wish I had that sort of money to spare.
    thats about a standard entry fee for any other type of racing ? f3 f2 f1 postie clasic sidecar motard etc
    "Instructions are just the manufacturers opinion on how to install it" Tim Taylor of "Tool Time"
    “Saying what we think gives us a wider conversational range than saying what we know.” - Cullen Hightower

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •