Microwave Temperature High For 2 Minutes

NC · 22nd June 2005, 19:06

Does anyone else think that Japan's going to have it's hand slapped again "Hiroishima styles" for fucking with the whales and buying votes? I believe that Bush is THAT stupid.

**Coyote** · 22nd June 2005, 19:09

Ohh, the title of this thread got me hoping that you had blown something up in the microwave

I don't think they'll send 'the bomb' over. Japan should be able to buy america over to their side. Allthough does america even care about insignificant whales or the ocean for that matter, with all the crap their factories are pumping into the water-ways?

**SuperDave** · 22nd June 2005, 19:26

Originally Posted by alarumba

Allthough does america even care about insignificant whales or the ocean for that matter, with all the crap their factories are pumping into the water-ways?

Of course they do! Whe pollutants that they release into our environment has nothing to do with it whatsover

**Jeremy** · 22nd June 2005, 19:41

No species "deserves" to live. The whales' best chance of surviving is if humans want to eat them, as that means that humans will work out a way to eventually form stable population. Like other domesticated animals, fish, plants, etc.

On the other hand if we leave them alone eventually they will all die. There will be a mass extinction and they are unlikely to survive, as large animals are usually the first to go. In 10 million years humans will probably still be around, a lot of other species won't though. The most genetically weak will be the first to go (it's not survival of the fittest, it's death of the weekest which aren't the same thing). We'll probably see the cheetah go extinct in our lifetime and there's nothing we can do to stop it unless we resort to genetic engineering. The gene stock there is so interbred that cheetahs will accept skin grafts from nearly any other cheetah. You can't do that in nearly any other animal even with relatives.

**WINJA** · 22nd June 2005, 19:51

Originally Posted by Jeremy

No species "deserves" to live. The whales' best chance of surviving is if humans want to eat them, as that means that humans will work out a way to eventually form stable population. Like other domesticated animals, fish, plants, etc.

On the other hand if we leave them alone eventually they will all die. There will be a mass extinction and they are unlikely to survive, as large animals are usually the first to go. In 10 million years humans will probably still be around, a lot of other species won't though. The most genetically weak will be the first to go (it's not survival of the fittest, it's death of the weekest which aren't the same thing). We'll probably see the cheetah go extinct in our lifetime and there's nothing we can do to stop it unless we resort to genetic engineering. The gene stock there is so interbred that cheetahs will accept skin grafts from nearly any other cheetah. You can't do that in nearly any other animal even with relatives.

ACTUALLY THIS IS TRUE FOR KIWIS , WE CAN FARM AND EAT THEM MMMMMMMMMMM KENTUCKY FRIED KIWI. BUT IT WONT WORK FOR WHALES BEST THING IS TO LET THEM BE, I SAY KILL THE FUCKERS THAT ARE HUNTING THE WHALES

**Jackrat** · 22nd June 2005, 20:02

I don't see why.It was American whalers that made them endangered in the first place.
Not to mention what they did to the world sword fish population.
The Japs are just as likely to do what ever they like an the rest of the world will sit back an watch.
See,thing is nobody cares enough not to buy their products.
An while we're pointing the finger,what do you ride.?
I may be an arsehole, but at lest I know it and admit it.

**Jackrat** · 22nd June 2005, 20:14

Originally Posted by Jeremy

No species "deserves" to live. The whales' best chance of surviving is if humans want to eat them, as that means that humans will work out a way to eventually form stable population. Like other domesticated animals, fish, plants, etc.

On the other hand if we leave them alone eventually they will all die. There will be a mass extinction and they are unlikely to survive, as large animals are usually the first to go. In 10 million years humans will probably still be around, a lot of other species won't though. The most genetically weak will be the first to go (it's not survival of the fittest, it's death of the weekest which aren't the same thing). We'll probably see the cheetah go extinct in our lifetime and there's nothing we can do to stop it unless we resort to genetic engineering. The gene stock there is so interbred that cheetahs will accept skin grafts from nearly any other cheetah. You can't do that in nearly any other animal even with relatives.

Good post mate.
Hunters saved the african elephant by making them worth something.
Once the local poachers that were killing them to sell their body parts so they could feed their familys realised they could get ten times the bucks by selling just one to rich hunters,they became a resource worth saving.
The locals that had been the poachers got jobs protecting them,thus feeding their familys.The countrys involed got more tourists.BUT, now they have a problem with to many elephants for the available range so they now cull them.
Weird buggers us humans.

**SPORK** · 22nd June 2005, 20:59

Anyone that nukes anyone for any reason is worthy of hell.

**Pixie** · 23rd June 2005, 01:32

Originally Posted by Jeremy

No species "deserves" to live. The whales' best chance of surviving is if humans want to eat them, as that means that humans will work out a way to eventually form stable population. Like other domesticated animals, fish, plants, etc.

On the other hand if we leave them alone eventually they will all die. There will be a mass extinction and they are unlikely to survive, as large animals are usually the first to go. In 10 million years humans will probably still be around, a lot of other species won't though. The most genetically weak will be the first to go (it's not survival of the fittest, it's death of the weekest which aren't the same thing). We'll probably see the cheetah go extinct in our lifetime and there's nothing we can do to stop it unless we resort to genetic engineering. The gene stock there is so interbred that cheetahs will accept skin grafts from nearly any other cheetah. You can't do that in nearly any other animal even with relatives.

Here's a man who knows what he's talking about.
All the anti-science,ignorant hippies of today,for all their professed love of nature,think that evolution and change has stopped.There is nothing special about secies alive today that won't see nature extinguish them if they can't adapt.Man is just another cause of change and is just as susceptable to extinction as any other species.If we continue to over populate we will become another of nature's failed experiments.

**Pixie** · 23rd June 2005, 01:40

Originally Posted by alarumba

Ohh, the title of this thread got me hoping that you had blown something up in the microwave

I don't think they'll send 'the bomb' over. Japan should be able to buy america over to their side. Allthough does america even care about insignificant whales or the ocean for that matter, with all the crap their factories are pumping into the water-ways?

What makes you think the yanks are worse polluters than china,europe,india or any other large population?Or isn't it pc to accuse third world countries and europe,of course,has strong "green" political movements,so they aren't guilty.

**onearmedbandit** · 23rd June 2005, 09:58

Originally Posted by NC

Does anyone else think that Japan's going to have it's hand slapped again "Hiroishima styles" for fucking with the whales and buying votes? I believe that Bush is THAT stupid.

WTF???

**Lias** · 23rd June 2005, 10:11

Originally Posted by Spleen

Anyone that nukes anyone for any reason is worthy of hell.

Why?
If I had access to a nuke, I'd happily nuke a bunch of people I didnt like. A nuke is just a large efficient weapon.. Its a shame about the enviromnental side effects.. Someoen really needs to invent a weapon that can wipe out all life on a continent without causing a nuclear winter :-)

**Odin** · 23rd June 2005, 10:18

Originally Posted by Jeremy

...... In 10 million years humans will probably still be around....

I don't think so. If we haven't bombed our self to death then I'm sure we'll have more or less ruined this planet. Global warming, ozone layer, land fills....dumping and burning every thing and nothing can go against the mighty $ no mater what. Recycling can only be done when it pays and who can be bothered to put things in the bin anyway. Go on get a Greenpeace sticker for your car/bike and pay them 5$ pr month but just keep chucking the bottles in the bin and don't worry at all about the buy and throw away mentality.

...and if that doesn't do it then in 10 mil years we'll all have to be hooked op to machines. These days everybody is surviving everything and gene defects are carried on and combined with other defects making for a grim future for our combined gene pool.

...or maybe an asteroid will hit us, or we'll manage to create a deadly disease to wipe us ....

In any case I'm quite sure we humans will kill our self's and most of the rest of the living creatures on this planet. Maybe the cockroach will rule the world next

**Marmoot** · 23rd June 2005, 10:18

Originally Posted by Jeremy

No species "deserves" to live. The whales' best chance of surviving is if humans want to eat them, as that means that humans will work out a way to eventually form stable population. Like other domesticated animals, fish, plants, etc.

LOL.....you just changed my way of thinking. Although, I doubt I will be seeing domesticated whales in local pet shop anytime soon.

This post gets my vote for the most creative of the year.