You believe what you want to man.
I aint no fkn sucker ok. You obviously dont know me.
We can all believe what we want.
You believe what you want to man.
I aint no fkn sucker ok. You obviously dont know me.
We can all believe what we want.
Whether you think you can or cant - you will always be right.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Yeah, it hurt them, a lot. Seeing it unfold on TV, on one of their national icons like that. Knowing their countrmen had been involved in some 'disaster'.....it took a while before anyone considered it a co-ordinated attack remember?
I was 3/4 drunk as a skunk in Darwin on 9/11. A USN Amphib grp was in port, shore leave granted, and kiwis and aussies were trying to compete with the yanks over the swedish backpackers invading the vic. Yanks dont grant leave during periods of heightened danger / tensions by the way.
Next thing ya know, their Shore Patrol teams, accompanied by regular marines, all combat armed!! were clearing out the bars in town. They marched straight up to the staff and told em to turn off the sounds, and loud hailer told all yank to report back onboard immediately - sailing orders. It was madness. Their mini fleet sailed the next day. Theres no way in hell them US servicemen had any fore warning about that event.
"Media being fed bad information?" You are on to something there.
There is something about this episode that I wonder about. Why do so many people STILL think Bin Laden did it? The FBI doesn't think he did it. The CIA doesn't think he did it. Dick Chaney doesn't think he did it. His name is often mentioned in the media at around the same time as 911 is mentioned. Is that how these geniuses put 2 and 2 together and deduce that ergo, he must have done it?
I suppose it is remotely possible that someone associated with Al Quaida was responsible but no concrete evidence points to Bin Laden. (Yes, there was that laughable fake video but I don't think anyone in their right mind would call that concrete evidence).
Did Al Quaida do it? Well, if you know what Al Quaida is, then stating that Al Quaida did it makes about as much sense as saying that facebook did it.
"- Bin Ladin's direct financial assets and strategic capabilities have been hugely exaggerated. The entity known as Al-Qaeda is simply the guest book for Muslims who entered Peshawar to join the jihad against Russia in Afghanistan. There is no such thing as a global terrorist organization known as Al-Qaeda! Bin-Laden is probably not directly, or even secondarily, responsible, but of course the media is able to trot out "links" that "prove" Bin-Ladin was involved. These "links" may be real, but Afghanistan was a haven for many dedicated Muslims who wanted to participate in a jihad, and many of these rich and powerful fanatics crossed paths in that country over the past twenty years. These links are far from "proof" or even "evidence" that Bin-Ladin was responsible for orchestrating and funding the September 11 attacks."
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com...inati_trap.htm
""The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the 'devil' only in order to drive the TV watcher to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the US . . ." -- Pierre-Henri Bunel"
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHART...akealqaeda.php
Did Islamics who hate America do it? Possibly, but to suggest that they would have had what it takes to pull of something like 911 seems rather far fetched.
I vote for an entity with the means to do it, the opportunity to do it and something to gain from doing it. That is the normal way to look at crime and it is strange to see people looking towards those who do not have the means, the opportunity and certainly nothing to gain and everthing to lose (as history has proven) as the perpetrators. Some people just watch too much Fox (faux) TV...
Ride fast or be last.
I was shaving smoko in a granite quarry in North Wales when it happened. remember the media frenzy very clearly. The whole world was shocked by it. Still are. The leaseholder of the Towers at the time walked away with a 7 billion insurance payout. He also instructed the (pulling) of tower 7. (pulling is a demolition industry term for bringing a building down by explosives) We also saw American forces quickly move into Iraq to look for weapons of mass destruction-but found none. Yet the media had us believing that Saddam Hussein had enough weaponry to take us all out. he had none. Not even depleted uranium as were found in all those people who were killed in Northern Iraq. The Americans are the only ones with that sort of weaponry. ( By the way -the people around that area are having multiple cancers now and children are being born everyday with severe abnormalities).
Propaganda is the most powerful tool for these world leaders who need the publics blessing to move into foreign countries and take their oil. Libya now-whos next??
Whether you think you can or cant - you will always be right.
1. So Saddam didnt condone the Chemical warfare the iraqi's made on the Kurds? Wait, the USA did that? Riiight.
2. Personally, I honestly do think the yanks are farrrrr less willing to engage in open warfare, or 'peace keeping/monitoring/enforcing' or whatever label they wish to use, nowadays, than they were 5 or 10 years ago. Libya is the most recent indication of this. If you follow the details. not the hate-websites.
The army are good at brainwashing too.
Just look at how many innocent people they can programme to kill other innocent people.
All for the ungodly dollar.
Whether you think you can or cant - you will always be right.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks