Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 39 of 39

Thread: Back protector?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    19th April 2009 - 18:52
    Bike
    SF
    Location
    Hamiltron
    Posts
    1,847
    Knox Aegis transmits less than 6kN in the CE test, gives better scapula protection and is not 2 inches thick.
    Doesn't it make sense that armour have an energy absorbing body of material that's covered by a more rigid shell? Eg helmets.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    3rd September 2008 - 16:28
    Bike
    '07 Suzuki SV1000/S
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    348
    Quote Originally Posted by steve_t View Post
    Knox Aegis transmits less than 6kN in the CE test, gives better scapula protection and is not 2 inches thick.
    Doesn't it make sense that armour have an energy absorbing body of material that's covered by a more rigid shell? Eg helmets.
    Yeah but helmets are designed to crack (resulting in their throw away recomendations post crash) , the average Knox armour is clearly not designed to disperse energy by breaking/fracturing as it's built like a brick shithouse

  3. #33
    Join Date
    19th April 2009 - 18:52
    Bike
    SF
    Location
    Hamiltron
    Posts
    1,847
    Quote Originally Posted by Lurch View Post
    Yeah but helmets are designed to crack (resulting in their throw away recomendations post crash) , the average Knox armour is clearly not designed to disperse energy by breaking/fracturing as it's built like a brick shithouse
    I thought most of the protection of a helmet came from the lining material compressing. Polystyrene only compresses once so after an impact, it no longer protects as well.
    Actually, thinking about back protectors, I would think that given the same thickness of the soft stuff, the harder shell would help spread the force over a larger area and reduce the transmitted force. I'd be interested to see what would happen to the Sub4 if it had a thin hard shell on the outside of it's 2 inches of Nitrex. Not sure how people fit that under their leathers comfortably

  4. #34
    Join Date
    10th December 2008 - 07:39
    Bike
    07 fz6n. 07cbarrrr600
    Location
    STRAYA
    Posts
    2,041
    Blog Entries
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by steve_t View Post
    I thought most of the protection of a helmet came from the lining material compressing. Polystyrene only compresses once so after an impact, it no longer protects as well.
    Actually, thinking about back protectors, I would think that given the same thickness of the soft stuff, the harder shell would help spread the force over a larger area and reduce the transmitted force. I'd be interested to see what would happen to the Sub4 if it had a thin hard shell on the outside of it's 2 inches of Nitrex. Not sure how people fit that under their leathers comfortably
    I was under the impression the hard outer of the helmet is to prevent penetration ?

    I have read some material, where softer plastic shelled helmets actually transmitted less energy to the head inside (than stiff shell), as the shell absorbed some of the impact through it deforming..

    Off topic I know, but $$$ helmet does not necessarily mean better protection. Wish I had of read more BEFORE I spent $800 on a helmet.
    Quote Originally Posted by sil3nt View Post
    Fkn crack up. Most awkward interviewee ever i reckon haha.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    28th August 2008 - 10:49
    Bike
    Various
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    722
    Quote Originally Posted by mazz1972 View Post
    Anyone have any comments on the Alpinestars Bionic back protector?
    I use one, find it very comfy fits snugly and normal Alpine Stars high quality.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    29th January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    2006 Suzuki GSX-R750 K6
    Location
    Te Puke
    Posts
    2,970
    Quote Originally Posted by mazz1972 View Post
    Anyone have any comments on the Alpinestars Bionic back protector?
    Yup! VERY comfy!
    At this stage I've worn mine lots, just not tried it for it's intended purpose.
    Alpinestars is good stuff!
    Member, sem fiddy appreciation society


    Quote Originally Posted by PrincessBandit View Post
    I find it ironic that the incredibly rude personal comments about Les were made by someone bearing an astonishing resemblance to a Monica Lewinsky dress accessory.

    Quote Originally Posted by PrincessBandit View Post
    All was good until I realised that having 105kg of man sliding into my rear was a tad uncomfortable after a while

  7. #37
    Join Date
    13th February 2011 - 13:56
    Bike
    2012 DR650
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    42

    Suitable back protector

    http://www.torpedo7.co.nz/products/A...tection-jacket

    CE level 2 protection, and the extra bits aswell for $250. (on special from $400)

    Any opinions? apparently the back protector can be removed (according to a video review ive seen).

    I figure a back protector should be on my list of things to get, Im just new to the motorcycle game and a little unsure.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    13th May 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    Thinking
    Location
    Around
    Posts
    7,383
    Quote Originally Posted by Desert Eagle View Post
    http://www.torpedo7.co.nz/products/A...tection-jacket

    CE level 2 protection, and the extra bits aswell for $250. (on special from $400)

    Any opinions? apparently the back protector can be removed (according to a video review ive seen).

    I figure a back protector should be on my list of things to get, Im just new to the motorcycle game and a little unsure.
    Make sure it will fit under your other gear, i.e jacket.

    FYI Knox Aegis back protectors are reduced in price down to $295
    Ive run out of fucks to give

  9. #39
    Join Date
    31st March 2005 - 02:18
    Bike
    CB919, 1090R, R1200GSA
    Location
    East Aucks
    Posts
    10,502
    Blog Entries
    140
    Ok, so I'm not quite the dummy Mr Biggles is, but a vote for Knox here, using an Aegis 8R (I think) and the chest armour.

    Had a lowside around 70kph, landing on my hip and chest, almost no marks or pains afterwards. Hip was a bit sensitive, but not much armour there.

    A tumble after getting off the bike at 100kph, literally felt like a washing machine spin cycle. Zero marks/pain/etc and felt fine right afterwards.

    I would always say you should be wearing back AND chest armour...
    Quote Originally Posted by Jane Omorogbe from UK MSN on the KTM990SM
    It's barking mad and if it doesn't turn you into a complete loon within half an hour of cocking a leg over the lofty 875mm seat height, I'll eat my Arai.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •