Should Katman shut the fuck up?

[Katman]

Are you also a conspiracy theorist? you reasonable sounding question belies your unreasonable expectations when discussing actual accidents.

And btw, you're conveniently ignoring the number of motorcycle accidents where there is no other party to blame other than the rider.

[Eyegasm]

The problem with half the drongos on here is that they don't understand basic English and instead choose to put words in my mouth.

Ok.

I have never said that there are not many times when fault must be shared. I have also never said that there are never times when fault doesn't lie with the motorcyclist.

Can you clean this sentence up then? So many words to make a small point.
To make sure your point is put across for all those "Drongos" why not make your
sentences easily understandable?

Essentially your above statement to me (Once taking out double negatives) is...

You've never stated that "There a times when fault must be shared" or "Fault doesn't lie with the motorcyclist"

So from my understanding, you are saying that it is always the motorcyclist fault.

Tell me if I am wrong?

[Ocean1]

The problem with half the drongos on here is that they don't understand basic English and instead choose to put words in my mouth.

To be more honest than might be strictly nescessary that's almost certainly because thay get frustrated at your lack of ability to do it for yourself. The fact that drongos can do it better is a telling commentary on your inteligence.

[Katman]

So from my understanding, you are saying that it is always the motorcyclist fault.

Tell me if I am wrong?

You couldn't have got it more wrong if you'd tried.

When you take out a double negative make sure you take out both. Taking out only one reverses the meaning of the sentence.

Looks like we've found our first drongo.

[MSTRS:Me]

The fact that drongos can do it better is a telling commentary on your inteligence.

The 'telling commentary' is more on those drongos that refuse to understand that in any crash, a bit of 'fault' lies with all involved.

[Eyegasm]

I have never said that there are not many times when fault must be shared. I have also never said that there are never times when fault doesn't lie with the motorcyclist.

You couldn't have got it more wrong if you'd tried.

When you take out a double negative make sure you take out both. Taking out only one reverses the meaning of the sentence.

Ok, I missed a never. My bad.

But why write such a complicated sentence? See, I even stuffed up your meaning.

[MSTRS:Me]

But why write such a complicated sentence? See, I even stuffed up your meaning.

Would you rather he went back to "You're a cock!" ? (and I don't mean you, personally, just anyone)

[Eyegasm]

Looks like we've found our first drongo.

Mate, So I missed a "Never" in your statement.

If you had of got to the point instead of beating round the bush it would have been easier to understand.

But hey I'll put my hand up for first drongo!

I doubt I was the first drongo to misinterpret your dribbling though.

[Katman]

If you had of got to the point instead of beating round the bush it would have been easier to understand.

Ok, let's remove the double negatives.

I have said that there are many times when fault must be shared. I have also said that there are times when fault doesn't lie with the motorcyclist.

Now if I'd said that, there would be cries of "Bullshit, you've never said those words" (which I don't recall ever having done so).

Hence the need for the double negatives.

[MSTRS:Me]

Is it reasonable to assume that no matter what someone posts, the content will be interpreted in different ways by different readers? Ways that were never intended by the OP.
And that whenever KM posts, because of some past ... indiscretions ... shall we say ... that for some readers, the red mist descends - and it's all on?

[willytheekid]

.......

[Eyegasm]

.......

OI... Share!!!

Just made me hungry for popcorn.

[Genie]

Is it reasonable to assume that no matter what someone posts, the content will be interpreted in different ways by different readers? Ways that were never intended by the OP.
And that whenever KM posts, because of some past ... indiscretions ... shall we say ... that for some readers, the red mist descends - and it's all on?

as always, it's each to their own and as you say, we all interpret it in our own head in our own voice...

like when you type you sound just like me

[MSTRS:Me]

as always, it's each to their own and as you say, we all interpret it in our own head in our own voice...

like when you type you sound just like me

The voices are always clear...I know what they are saying. Do you really want to find out?

[StoneY]

The voices are always clear...I know what they are saying. Do you really want to find out?

In your case MSTRS they're speaking in tongues I am sure....buwahahahahaha