So if im reading this right If I say i am not ROSSIE and that he is evil then I might actualy be rossieOriginally Posted by MikeL
![]()
Dont worry im just kidding I know what you are trying to say!
So if im reading this right If I say i am not ROSSIE and that he is evil then I might actualy be rossieOriginally Posted by MikeL
![]()
Dont worry im just kidding I know what you are trying to say!
Second is the fastest loser
"It is better to have ridden & crashed than never to have ridden at all" by Bruce Bennett
DB is the new Porridge. Cause most of the mods must be sucking his cock ..... Or his giving them some oral help? How else can you explain it?
I honestly don't know Lou.Originally Posted by Lou Girardin
Revulsion has not proved to stop this behaviour up until now. It has often driven these people to amazing lengths to reach their objectives. Imagine if he started down the whole leader of religion thing just so he would get his opportunity? My god thats one powerful long time compulsion and if this is the case it is very (very) scary.
Perhaps the behaviour does need understanding because these people thrive in an atmosphere of fear and ignorance. If the kids knew it was wrong and the parents more alert this might have stopped before it started!
I dunno...
My point about understanding being irrelevant is based on the fact that this is a primal drive for people like Capill. It can be the prime motivator in their lives.
And yes, people do whatever it takes to get access to their victims. Scoutmasters? Priests? Teachers? Pop Stars?
I don't think that reaslistically there is much that can be done. Even the 'stranger danger' campaign didn't work because most abusers aren't strangers.
Speed doesn't kill people.
Stupidity kills people.
[QUOTEAnd yes, people do whatever it takes to get access to their victims. Scoutmasters? Priests? Teachers? Pop Stars?
I.[/QUOTE]
as usall..... everyone forgets about the painters out there... and sales men![]()
![]()
this is just an atempt to some how lighten the subject.. it is probaly in bad taste .. but you have to know me. i try (sometimes too hard ) to see the funny side of every situation... if i didn't i probly be dead....![]()
what a ride so far!!!!
1 KILLING ANOTHER HUMAN CAN SOMETIMES BE JUSTIFIED 2 TOUCHING LITTLE GIRLS CAN NEVER BE JUSTIFIED AND IF SOMEONE THINKS IT CAN BE REFER BACK TO 1.Originally Posted by Lou Girardin
IN SOME CASES THE EMOTIONAL TRAUMA CANT BE EASED , SOME GIRLS COMMIT SUICDE I DONT CALL THAT EASED.
BEST THING IS SEND A CLEAR MESSAGE AND MAKE AN EXAMPLE OF CAPEL.
That guy who made the PATHETIC attempt at slapping him outside the courthouse got 2 years.
..it's another red light nightmare..
THAT SLAP BROKE CAPELS JAW , GOOD JOB TOO, I HEARD THE GUY WHO PUNCHED HIM IS A ROGUE BUT I STILL WANT TO SEND HIM A CARTON OF SMOKESOriginally Posted by 750Y
Part of the problem lies within christian beliefs themselves.
Sex is natural, christianity says that unless its with someone your married to, its wrong. If your a priest, often you cant have sex. Its says no sex, none.
It turns the natural into the perverse, so the truely perverse (such as sexually abusing a 5 year old which may be easily accessible) is not, in the minds of the righteous (like capel) any worse than the natural.
Think about it.
That was a funny clip... I vote for castration, public stoning and crusifiction... thats what he'd want.Originally Posted by WINJA
(sorry about the spelling)
wasnt a bad slap, when I first saw it I told my partner that they guy who did it had done some boxing. Sure enough!
INTRODUCTION:Originally Posted by MikeL
He's a f*#ken a-hole!
MAIN ESSAY BODY:
He's a f*#ken a-hole!
CONCLUSION:
He's a f*#ken a-hole!
University of common sense says I don't need any references to back that up.
As I recall the guy who whacked Capill got jail time for the assault. Hopefully they get to be cell buddies, or at the very least Capill gets to drop the soap a few times for the lads.Originally Posted by WINJA
BUT YOU KNOW SOME OF CAPELS MATES WILL BUY HIM SOAP ON A ROPE , I CANT BELIEVE HE STILL HAS FRIENDSOriginally Posted by spudchucka
To right sex is ESSENTIAL, try going without a piss for a couple of days......the church is wrong......hail the god of jiggy jiggy , all bowOriginally Posted by Timber020
Christian beliefs do state that sex is natural but that God originally made one woman for the man Adam and for them to remain in a marriage union for their whole lifetime together on earth. This was the model God intended mankind to follow, and many good men and women have been able to throughout history. I'm sure there will be some KBer's that will have this testimony.Originally Posted by Timber020
The part about being a priest and not having sex is something the religious cults have concocted and practise, they are the ones who are turning the natural into perverse! The Christian Handbook is very clear that a priest/minister can have one wife with whom a sexual relationship should be practised to fulfil that natural purpose & desire.
Abusing of a 5 year old, let alone any human being, is actually unnatural and perverse and utterly condemned by God in the Christian Bible.
So part of the problem doesn't lie with Christian beliefs at all, more a misunderstanding and perversion of those beliefs!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks