Page 1 of 32 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 480

Thread: 9/11 conspiracy debate

  1. #1
    Join Date
    8th February 2011 - 01:08
    Bike
    07' Kwaka GPX250R
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    117
    Blog Entries
    1

    Lightbulb Still alot of unanswered Q's

    Who plantd the bombs in those 3 buildings that day? Lest we forget 9/11 had an inside hand involved. Buildings don't fall at freefall speed without having the path cleared below the falling matter. FULLSTOP.
    Catering and Personal Chef services please see the below link: KB'ers Discounts avail
    http://www.trademe.co.nz/Browse/List...x?id=318795528

  2. #2
    Join Date
    27th February 2005 - 08:47
    Bike
    a red heap
    Location
    towel wronger
    Posts
    6,522
    Quote Originally Posted by GPXchick View Post
    Who plantd the bombs in those 3 buildings that day? Lest we forget 9/11 had an inside hand involved. Buildings don't fall at freefall speed without having the path cleared below the falling matter. FULLSTOP.
    oh, I thought it was the two giant fucken planes that parked in them that might of had something to do with it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    22nd April 2005 - 21:18
    Bike
    2009 Husqvarna SM610ie
    Location
    Zork
    Posts
    1,725
    Quote Originally Posted by GPXchick View Post
    Who plantd the bombs in those 3 buildings that day? Lest we forget 9/11 had an inside hand involved. Buildings don't fall at freefall speed without having the path cleared below the falling matter. FULLSTOP.
    Come to think of it......

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	intredasting.jpg 
Views:	39 
Size:	47.9 KB 
ID:	237841

  4. #4
    Join Date
    10th December 2009 - 22:42
    Bike
    less than I used to have
    Location
    Canterbury
    Posts
    3,168
    Quote Originally Posted by GPXchick View Post
    Who plantd the bombs in those 3 buildings that day? Lest we forget 9/11 had an inside hand involved. Buildings don't fall at freefall speed without having the path cleared below the falling matter. FULLSTOP.
    ...and the bunkers the germans built on the somme were poured with cement supplied by a british company....hmmm..

  5. #5
    Join Date
    21st August 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    2017 Suzuki Dl1000
    Location
    Picton
    Posts
    5,177
    Quote Originally Posted by GPXchick View Post
    Who plantd the bombs in those 3 buildings that day? Lest we forget 9/11 had an inside hand involved. Buildings don't fall at freefall speed without having the path cleared below the falling matter. FULLSTOP.
    Actually, only the top stories fell at freefall speed, the lower ones concertina'd at a slightly lower rate. all consistant with the type of collapse one would expect from a destroyed skeleton on a high rise structure.

    It is fully explained by the aircraft crashing into them.
    Time to ride

  6. #6
    Join Date
    5th November 2007 - 15:56
    Bike
    Triumph's answer to the GN250
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    1,037
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by nodrog View Post
    oh, I thought it was the two giant fucken planes that parked in them that might of had something to do with it.
    Nah, coincidence. A bunch of arabs stole some planes and planned to do a bit of a low level pass over New York - probably to impress some women - but they couldn't fly very well and ended up hitting the twin towers by accident - just as the CIA were blowing up the buildings.

    My guess is nobody told them about target fixation, so ultimately it's Katman's fault.
    Don't blame me, I voted Green.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    13th February 2006 - 13:12
    Bike
    raptor 1000
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    2,975
    Quote Originally Posted by GPXchick View Post
    Who plantd the bombs in those 3 buildings that day? Lest we forget 9/11 had an inside hand involved. Buildings don't fall at freefall speed without having the path cleared below the falling matter. FULLSTOP.
    really?? look what a little shake did to the CTV building in ChCh, imagine the weight of those floors above where the planes hit, it falls from above the impact site, when buildings are demolished they blow the bottom of them out and the weight from above does the work

  8. #8
    Join Date
    27th August 2009 - 12:15
    Bike
    CRF450 '09
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    461
    Quote Originally Posted by GPXchick View Post
    Who plantd the bombs in those 3 buildings that day? Lest we forget 9/11 had an inside hand involved. Buildings don't fall at freefall speed without having the path cleared below the falling matter. FULLSTOP.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jantar View Post
    Actually, only the top stories fell at freefall speed, the lower ones concertina'd at a slightly lower rate. all consistant with the type of collapse one would expect from a destroyed skeleton on a high rise structure.

    It is fully explained by the aircraft crashing into them.
    GPX - way off base, Buildings can be built with the reinforcing on the inside or the outside, and the twin towers were built with the reinforcing on the outside (those long metal rails running down it you see in all the old pictures). When the jet liners hit the buildings, the fuel burnt at such a heat, as well as all the bars that had been taken out, most of the rest melted so the building lost all it's reinforcement.
    Smoke 'em if you have 'em

    You run what you brung, and pray you brought enough

  9. #9
    Join Date
    21st October 2009 - 11:23
    Bike
    > 1 < 10
    Location
    Auckland,North Shore
    Posts
    826
    Quote Originally Posted by GPXchick View Post
    Who plantd the bombs in those 3 buildings that day QUESTION MARK? Lest we forget 9/11 had an inside hand involved FULLSTOP. Buildings don't fall at freefall speed without having the path cleared below the falling matter FULLSTOP. FULLSTOP.
    fixed that for ya FULLSTOP.
    ***** POLITICIANS *****
    People Of Little Integrity Thieving Innocent Citizens Incomes And Need Shooting

    *******KASPA*******
    Knavery Artificial Spurious Pretentious Arseholes

  10. #10
    Join Date
    9th January 2011 - 23:31
    Bike
    83 GPz550
    Location
    NP
    Posts
    498
    Quote Originally Posted by JimO View Post
    really?? look what a little shake did to the CTV building in ChCh, imagine the weight of those floors above where the planes hit, it falls from above the impact site, when buildings are demolished they blow the bottom of them out and the weight from above does the work
    Its like using Karate to break stone pavers.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    16th September 2004 - 16:48
    Bike
    PopTart Katoona
    Location
    CT, USA
    Posts
    6,542
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by motor_mayhem View Post
    GPX - way off base, Buildings can be built with the reinforcing on the inside or the outside, and the twin towers were built with the reinforcing on the outside (those long metal rails running down it you see in all the old pictures). When the jet liners hit the buildings, the fuel burnt at such a heat, as well as all the bars that had been taken out, most of the rest melted so the building lost all it's reinforcement.
    I am still yet to see a single structural engineer explain why it didn't tip.......
    My years of failing at the game Jenga tell me that stuff like that always tips. My qualifications tell me nothing better due to large partaking of alcohol during statics and dynamics lectures.
    Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    15th June 2008 - 18:13
    Bike
    rego on hold nick smith special
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    1,933
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Jantar View Post
    Actually, only the top stories fell at freefall speed, the lower ones concertina'd at a slightly lower rate. all consistant with the type of collapse one would expect from a destroyed skeleton on a high rise structure.

    It is fully explained by the aircraft crashing into them.
    In order to have the structure collapse like it did you would have to cut the beams at the very bottom not unlike the method used in a controlled demolition where the beams are cut on a diagonal. You can see this for yourself on the photos of the core beam remnants- they have been cut on a diagonal causing molten metal to sit around the edges... molten metal far higher in temperature than any jet fuel.

    Not buying into all the collusion rubbish but there is something that doesn't add up...
    ...Full throttle till you see god, then brake.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    7th April 2011 - 14:31
    Bike
    NZ250
    Location
    down in a hole
    Posts
    130
    Quote Originally Posted by racefactory View Post
    Bullshit, any engineer knows it's a controlled demolition.
    You an engineer bro?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    21st August 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    2017 Suzuki Dl1000
    Location
    Picton
    Posts
    5,177
    Quote Originally Posted by racefactory View Post
    Bullshit, any engineer knows it's a controlled demolition.

    The core beam structure of those towers could survive multiple plane impacts, ......
    Except those buildings didn't have a core beam structure, they were a skeletal beam structure.

    Where did you you get your engineering qualifications?
    Time to ride

  15. #15
    Join Date
    12th July 2003 - 01:10
    Bike
    Royal Enfield 650 & a V8 or two..
    Location
    The Riviera of the South
    Posts
    14,068
    Quote Originally Posted by racefactory View Post
    Bullshit, any engineer knows it's a controlled demolition.
    Just a casual observer can notice the buildings do not fall like physics would depict in that situation. Not buying into all the collusion rubbish but there is something that doesn't add up...
    The guy on the grassy knoll did it...
    Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........
    " Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •