Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Weight difference

  1. #1
    Join Date
    15th June 2008 - 18:13
    Bike
    rego on hold nick smith special
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    1,933
    Blog Entries
    1

    Weight difference

    just wondering if a 160 would be noticeably heavier than a 140 and if it would affect acceleration? Maybe individual brand/model has more to do with this than a 20 size difference?
    ...Full throttle till you see god, then brake.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    21st August 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    2017 Suzuki Dl1000
    Location
    Picton
    Posts
    5,177
    That depends on just what you are asking. I don't know of any motorcycles that have both 140 and 160 models, but if it's a Piper Cherokee you're thinking of then the weight is almost identical.

    Oh.... It's tyres. Weight will not make any difference, but the size difference will have a major effect on handling.
    Time to ride

  3. #3
    Join Date
    15th June 2008 - 18:13
    Bike
    rego on hold nick smith special
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    1,933
    Blog Entries
    1
    Weight difference will have effect of course.

    I am just asking about difference in weight between 140 and 160, not handling.
    ...Full throttle till you see god, then brake.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    12th January 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    '87 CR500, '10 RM144
    Location
    'Kura, Auckland, Kiwiland
    Posts
    3,728
    You are correct in assuming that brand/model has a greater effect on the weight than the size.
    Drew for Prime Minister!

    www.oldskoolperformance.com

    www.prospeedmc.com for parts ex U.S.A ( He's a Kiwi! )

  5. #5
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    Down to the bike shop with some scales for you, cause next you'll wanna know which brand is lighter!

    All things being equal (ok, so they never are, but...) then sure a smaller one will have less materials so will be lighter.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    24th September 2008 - 01:32
    Bike
    a shiny new(ish) one
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    3,650
    wouldnt the weight difference be proportional to the increase/decrease in width, assuming the side walls are the same?

    I cant really think of an application where the weight would be more important than the resulting handling characteristics

  7. #7
    Join Date
    15th June 2008 - 18:13
    Bike
    rego on hold nick smith special
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    1,933
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by DEATH_INC. View Post
    You are correct in assuming that brand/model has a greater effect on the weight than the size.
    thanks dude
    ...Full throttle till you see god, then brake.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    22nd August 2003 - 22:33
    Bike
    ...
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    4,205
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by Jantar View Post
    That depends on just what you are asking. I don't know of any motorcycles that have both 140 and 160 models, but if it's a Piper Cherokee you're thinking of then the weight is almost identical.

    Oh.... It's tyres. Weight will not make any difference, but the size difference will have a major effect on handling.
    the 160 is only the same mauw as the 140 if it started life as a 140 and was re-engined. an original 160 is good for another 250-300lbs over a 140/modded 160.

    i fly a 140 regularly, and you wouldn't want to put 4 adults in it! a 160 - maybe - a 180, definately. my pick is the 200-r and the Pathfinder

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •