Rules for Husaberg

[husaberg]

http://www.mnz.co.nz/newsDetail.aspx...rticleID=28927

Your interpretation might not match MNZ's but it's their one that counts.


Just to save the big read, here is relevant conclusion:

bloody party poopers the MNZ what do they know about chemistry

do you have a copy of the origional rules the old 130.5cc and 100cc 2 stroke ones interesting to see where the s got added I only happened to see it a couple of months ago in the new rules

[husaberg]

It all stems from one idiot making a fool of himself. That happens anywhere, even the local bowls club.

"only one idiot really"
come on I can count at least 10 of them
but I've got my socks on there could be more.


And I object to the bowls comment I haven't played bowls for years.
I was thrown out for oggling the chicks to much

[koba]

"only one idiot really"
come on I can count at least 10 of them
but I've got my socks on there could be more.


And I object to the bowls comment I haven't played bowls for years.
I was thrown out for oggling the chicks to much

Oh we ARE all idiots, I just meant there was only one stirring shit.

Mmmm, bowls chicks!

[koba]

do you have a copy of the origional rules the old 130.5cc and 100cc 2 stroke ones interesting to see where the s got added I only happened to see it a couple of months ago in the new rules

Don't have any that old. will have a look for the oldest I do have.

[bucketracer]

http://www.mnz.co.nz/newsDetail.aspx...rticleID=28927

[10] The Board agrees that where there are words in a Rule that are ambiguous, vague or uncertain, it should take a ‘purposive’ approach to their interpretation. The question therefore becomes one of identifying the purpose of a Rule.

Common sense ..............

[Buckets4Me]

http://www.mnz.co.nz/newsDetail.aspx...rticleID=28927

[10] The Board agrees that where there are words in a Rule that are ambiguous, vague or uncertain, it should take a ‘purposive’ approach to their interpretation. The question therefore becomes one of identifying the purpose of a Rule.

Common sense ..............

so some parts are allowed (cam valves piston exaust) the other parts must then be considered disallowed .

Logic

and for the choclate fish award
[16] As indicated above, the Board hereby determines that Nitro Oxide constitutes a “similar agent” for the purposes of Rule 10-17-4. Its use is therefore prohibited in all classes of racing, including for land speed record attempts.

[husaberg]

and for the choclate fish award
[16] As indicated above, the Board hereby determines that Nitro Oxide constitutes a “similar agent” for the purposes of Rule 10-17-4. Its use is therefore prohibited in all classes of racing, including for land speed record attempts.

Sorry dude prize already claimed Jason has already laid claim go back 2 or 3 pages As he lived in the USA I think I am going to be paying big time of what was off the cuff remark I had to post 3 times before anyone twigged if you had a look you would see I have already conceded defeat swallowed by pride and begged for forgivness and moved on to lusting after octogenarians, This shit storm while fun started because Dave and Speedpro both assumed I was some idiot who had never read the rules and even when I tried to get them to stop for a minute to read them as they were written Shit I knoe what the rules were intended to say and even tried to piont that out the spirit of the rules and all but everyone just jumped in a started slinging shit 'Well I am a bit of a hothead so when in Rome. Well I shit kicked back and even when Wobbly waded in got them to actually read the rules I am still the villain well I Shit have got a thick skin and don't mind a joke .But when push comes to shove it seams there is a few who can sling it but when it comes back they get all uptight well get over it I have.
Speedpro has fussed up Dave is claiming (yeah right) he never said you weren't allowed to use parts made for or from completion engines. Its all sorted. I just want a copy of the old 100cc 2 stroke and 125cc four stroke rules so we can see where the cock up started I think the office lady added a s by mistake .But the ruling made for by the mnz on nitrous was flawed from the start as the appellant should have used the oxidizer ruling that is the rub of the matter he was doomed before he even started but yes they have created a precedence with their ruling. I can live with that. but simply if the guy had have been serious about the matter he should have appealed on the grounds that they offered no technical explanation to how it was similar and the scientific and technical qualifications of the advice the technical committee undertook. I am guessing they would come up thin. But at the end of the day they make the rules they are the sole judge and jury.

[gav]

bloody party poopers the MNZ what do they know about chemistry

do you have a copy of the origional rules the old 130.5cc and 100cc 2 stroke ones interesting to see where the s got added I only happened to see it a couple of months ago in the new rules

OK found a rule book from 01/02 season, the 2 stroke 125 limit was 130.5cc and 4 strokes was 140cc.
The S in question is in place in these rules, ie motors and trans parts ...

[husaberg]

OK found a rule book from 01/02 season, the 2 stroke 125 limit was 130.5cc and 4 strokes was 140cc.
The S in question is in place in these rules, ie motors and trans parts ...

Weird

I think me old man would have a copy of the origional rules hes a horder from way back .He likes his bikes too. he and a couple of mates started a little old street race round here been going 21 years now.I missed the first one but made it for the second,and raced at a lot after that until. I brought my first farm and and now I am famous I should make a comeback. I bet I am faster now than i remember I was ......Yeah Right . My eldest boy's doing Mx now and my daughters going to follow soon . The boy has already won more throphy's now at 7, than I won in 10 years of racing and he's a real midget too. the buggers better at rugby league than i wasx too., but don't tell him that.

[jaffaonajappa]

Sorry dude prize already claimed Jason has

Was a typo im guessing......reckon he meant the chocolate STAR fish award.

[husaberg]

Was a typo im guessing......reckon he meant the chocolate STAR fish award.

jaffa do you know what the definition of a a expert is, and do you know what a camel is that have something in common

[jaffaonajappa]

jaffa do you know what the definition of a a expert is, and do you know what a camel is that have something in common

Without meaning to get Toooo personal.....I have trouble reading what you type. Engarish please.

[husaberg]

Without meaning to get Toooo personal.....I have trouble reading what you type. Engarish please.

nasty dude nasty that hurts spell checks for pussies anyway

An expert is a drip under pressure or alternatively a idiot more than 100 kilometer from home and a camel is of course a horse designed by committee.

[koba]

nasty dude nasty that hurts spell checks for pussies anyway

An expert is a drip under pressure or alternatively a idiot more than 100 kilometer from home and a camel is of course a horse designed by committee.

A Spurt is a drip under pressure.

X is an unknown Quantity.

[husaberg]

A Spurt is a drip under pressure.

X is an unknown Quantity.

y o y o y o y r u o I c y ..x=10x10......10x10 = y u r x = 100 kmy=?

x = distance in this case

y u r 10x10 km Y