Hey can i get some experienced opinions on metzeler z6's and z8 interact's and pirelli diablo corsa III's and diablo rosso II please? needa get some new ones for a new bike
Hey can i get some experienced opinions on metzeler z6's and z8 interact's and pirelli diablo corsa III's and diablo rosso II please? needa get some new ones for a new bike
The Z8 is a better tyre than the Z6 but I'm now hesitant to buy a rear tyre that hasn't got tread across the centre. Not for any handling or water-shedding abilities but because you've got no effective means of knowing how much wear is left until shreds of steel appear. I've had that happen with a Z6 and with a Pirelli Angel.
I've never used Diablos. They're a different type of tyre to either the Z6 or Z8. The nearest equivalent, indeed the exact equivalent (given that Pirelli and Metzeler are the same company) is the Diablo Strada. And I'd caution about using one of those for the same reasons I outlined regarding the Z6 and the Angel.
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
I have a Z8 on my front tyre and a Dunlop sportmax GPR 200 on the back, Iv never had pirelli's though.
Dude if you want a good ride with the best performance dont mix tyres, they are designed to work together as a pair. wet performance and turn in performance are both affected by different rubber on the same machine, dont do it waste of time ;-)
96 gsxr 750. Ideally i'd put the diablos on for the kinda bike it is, but i'm gonna be carrying a passenger every now and then so i don't know what the wear will be like on the sport tires opposed to the sport touring ones. and am i right in saying that sport touring tires usually have more tread and do better in the wet?
I've run Z6's, Z6 Interact and Diablo's at one stage or another, they're all bloody good tyres that i would definately use again. The Lack of tread in the centre has never bothered me.
The Buell currently shod in Z6 Interacts,I would like to try the Z8's if they are better than the Z6's as Hitcher says they'd be bloody good.
Harley Davidson: The most efficient way to convert gasoline into noise without the side effects of horsepower.
'Fast' Harleys are only fast compared to stock Harleys.
I had a set of Z8's on the Hayabusa and managed 5,500 kms on them before I traded the Bike in . That included a 2,500km trip aound the country 2 up with all the gear and never had a problem with them and was quite amazed how well they performed in the wet and dry . They were only starting to show signs of wear when I traded the Bike , no squaring at all - I'll be getting another set on my new Bike for sure .
While wear is important, it shouldn't be the only determinant of tyre performance. For example, my Battlax 021s are wearing well: 9,200km and little squaring or scruffing, and still plenty of tread depth on the rear. However they are a bit ambiguous in the wet and the front takes a while to commit when being pushed hard through things twisty. I suspect 12,000km could be a possibility, although I'll be quick to condemn if performance suffers any more as they tire.
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
Agree 100%. I have a theory about this too.
Face it, it would cost the makers nothing to have made the tyre with four evenly spaced 3mm wide 'holes' of tread in the centre indicating when the tyre was stuffed. There would be zero affect on performance etc.
My theory as to why they do not do this is that they get a incorrectly perceived extended life out of them - lots of Internet heros claiming big kms out of a tyre that was effectively worn out several thousand kms before they were replaced due to 'wires' showing.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks