Stupid World

[Ocean1]

Amusing. What was he doing there? Oh yeah, he was helping to hand in a petition from 300,000 people that are protesting being kicked out of their houses so that an American company can build nicer houses and up the rents.

Having not even bothered watching the clip I'm pretty sure the protesters in question didn't own "their" houses, right?

In which case they should up their game or stfu.

Same as that fuckwit brand.

[mashman]

Having not even bothered watching the clip I'm pretty sure the protesters in question didn't own "their" houses, right?

In which case they should up their game or stfu.

Same as that fuckwit brand.

There was no clip. T'was merely a Brand bash of less than 2 lines. ... I'd say they have every right in the world to the house given that some have lived in them for over 20 years, and by default own it. Some of 'em were done up right nice too.

They are upping their game, and had the support of the New York City mayor who had also had a run in with the same company.

Coz he stands alone?

You sound scared? Are you white?

[bogan]

There was no clip. T'was merely a Brand bash of less than 2 lines. ... I'd say they have every right in the world to the house given that some have lived in them for over 20 years, and by default own it. Some of 'em were done up right nice too.

They are upping their game, and had the support of the New York City mayor who had also had a run in with the same company.

Coz he stands alone?

You sound scared? Are you white?

It was actually a teaser to a Sun exclusive article about RB's tax dodging ways; nothing was mentioned in reference to the housing evictions. I mean being rich and advocating socialism without doing much charity is one thing, but being rich as well as avoiding paying social taxes and advocating socialism is an entire level of arseholery above.

[mashman]

It was actually a teaser to a Sun exclusive article about RB's tax dodging ways; nothing was mentioned in reference to the housing evictions. I mean being rich and advocating socialism without doing much charity is one thing, but being rich as well as avoiding paying social taxes and advocating socialism is an entire level of arseholery above.

Tis the landlord they're calling a tax-avoider innit. Having said that, he may well have had a good accountant once upon a many moons ago... but that was many moons ago.

[jonbuoy]

It was actually a teaser to a Sun exclusive article about RB's tax dodging ways; nothing was mentioned in reference to the housing evictions. I mean being rich and advocating socialism without doing much charity is one thing, but being rich as well as avoiding paying social taxes and advocating socialism is an entire level of arseholery above.

Champagne socialist. Somehow I don't think the pay disparity between himself and the cleaner on set keeps him awake at night.

[Ocean1]

I'd say they have every right in the world to the house given that some have lived in them for over 20 years, and by default own it.

That's 'cause you're an idiot. Any loser can live in someone else's house, owning one requires you to pay for it in roughly 100% of the world.

[mashman]

That's 'cause you're an idiot. Any loser can live in someone else's house, owning one requires you to pay for it in roughly 100% of the world.

You're white, arenchoo. You merely owe no money against the property you've just rented or paid off... but you don't never own it. They're all unemployed huh? Oh dear. In your world I would have thought that some of them should have more of a right to the property than others? Coz they're not all unemployed.

[Ocean1]

You're white, arenchoo.

Culturally Kiwi, Racially mixed, same as every other fucker.

You merely owe no money against the property you've just rented or paid off... but you don't never own it.

Wrong.

They're all unemployed huh? Oh dear. In your world I would have thought that some of them should have more of a right to the property than others? Coz they're not all unemployed.

I don't give a fuck whether they're employed or not, the only way you have the right to any property is by purchasing it.

[Brian d marge]

Having not even bothered watching the clip I'm pretty sure the protesters in question didn't own "their" houses, right?

In which case they should up their game or stfu.

Same as that fuckwit brand.

have you even been to london

what you are saying is that everyone in east london should have a disposable income of around 100k

but then its the persons fault . . individual responsibility and all that

[bogan]

Tis the landlord they're calling a tax-avoider innit. Having said that, he may well have had a good accountant once upon a many moons ago... but that was many moons ago.

Yeh and I'm sure brand was copmpletely aware of his landlord's and accountant's trnasgressions Jimmy Carr did it better mate.

Champagne socialist. Somehow I don't think the pay disparity between himself and the cleaner on set keeps him awake at night.

Yeh, reckon it is more of the messiah type complex; he has a right to all of those luxuries in a socialist utopia because he is its proponent, he is the saviour. And the stupid worlders just lap it up cos he says things that they like.

[Brian d marge]

He is a massive hypocrite though. If the man does not take his own message on board, how good can it be?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...ss-empire.html

so someone with the means is helpng some other without

and the problem is ????

ya dont see wesbrooke or cameron standing up for the average joe

labor is running behing the band wagon as they sniff at a chance

[bogan]

so someone with the means is helpng some other without

and the problem is ????

ya dont see wesbrooke or cameron standing up for the average joe

labor is running behing the band wagon as they sniff at a chance

No problem with that part of it, its the bit where he says socialism is the way to go, but continues to enjoy capitalist luxury which would be unattainable for him under a socialist system due to redistribution of his wealth; why does he not charitably redistribute his wealth now to start the ball rolling? to provide a little help those who need it? that is the hypocrisy I see.

[Ocean1]

have you even been to london

what you are saying is that everyone in east london should have a disposable income of around 100k

but then its the persons fault . . individual responsibility and all that

I lived in London for several years.

And what I'm saying is that you own something when you've paid for it.

If you had the basics of English you'd have picked up on that straight away.

[Brian d marge]

No problem with that part of it, its the bit where he says socialism is the way to go, but continues to enjoy capitalist luxury which would be unattainable for him under a socialist system due to redistribution of his wealth; why does he not charitably redistribute his wealth now to start the ball rolling? to provide a little help those who need it? that is the hypocrisy I see.

he does look at where the proceeds of the latest book are going to

you are going to see a lot more muck raking . ,if ya go head to head with murdock this is what happens

at the end of the day he is front and centre helping some people live in the community they are entitled to

i was born and bred 1/2 mile up the road from hoxton and a few mates live on that estate

theyfor the most part are good honest hard working people . . they fix the tube trains at night , drive cabs , work on the markets

sooo according to some its ok for an american preditory company to buy up your house . . or even the area around your own house, the one you paid for when thatcher allowed ya to buy them
The slap market rent . . and all the associated tax effectively forcing you out

and people think this is ok ???

kama will be such a byatch

stephen

[mashman]

Culturally Kiwi, Racially mixed, same as every other fucker.

Wrong.

I don't give a fuck whether they're employed or not, the only way you have the right to any property is by purchasing it.

Ok, blue white then.