Stupid World

[mashman]

No Worthwhile Objective? I though that was NOW though, No Objective Worthwhile...

Sounds like frustrated jealousy to me herr mushy (cos you clearly miss the mark of realistic insult, again), prejudices against your betters do not make for a very long lived 'rebellion'

Nice crapronyms.

You're the one reading prejudice into the post nummnutz.

[bogan]

You need to pull your head out the ground, if capitalism was unimpeded we'd have monopolies or cartels everywhere

Only if there is a lack of competition. And I somehow think fast food is a bit hard to create a monopoly, given low cost of market entry.

Nice crapronyms.

You're the one reading prejudice into the post nummnutz.

If the shoe fits.

What prejudice? You're just reading prejudice into my reading of your post; and it's numbnuts (a dearth of activity in ones head), not nummnuts (cos you ain't tasted mine, sonny).

[mashman]

He wouldn't even ask his own sister for help -not much anyone can about that. No not lost how to be a human - part of that is being prepared to look after yourself- or at least try.

True. Who in their right mind, oh, hang on, perhaps being in their right mind is the problem in the first place. There is no try when you're not looking to try... for whatever reasons I know not, so absolutely some will slip through the cracks, but there are those who do whilst in care of the system and that doesn't build trust when you're looking for something to grab a hold of. That's just one way of looking at it... and it would seem that most people are generally looking after themselves. However assigning a value to stuff to make sure lots of other people get less so that a very few can get more doesn't sound like a very human centric approach to me. More the breaking omelets and eggs thing.

[mashman]

If the shoe fits.

What prejudice? You're just reading prejudice into my reading of your post; and it's numbnuts (a dearth of activity in ones head), not nummnuts (cos you ain't tasted mine, sonny).

I have caps, tin foil caps.

In which case I had the correct spelling... however I had a different reason for using two mm's... and it had nothing to do with your incestuous far fetched filthy feltching fetish fantasy that you seem to have had in mind as "my" definition.

[bogan]

however I had a different reason for using two mm's...

A mild stroke? pun intended*




*Most other threads/readers I'd let them appreciate the pun through their own intellect, but gotta throw you dumb fucks a bone** in here.

**you really shouldn't need this one, but, pun intended, again.

[Brian d marge]

Guess Who Profits From Selling Off NHS: Russell B…: http://youtu.be/Gs4Few3CbIw

floggin off the health care . .old news

nz rolled over and died years ago

[Ocean1]

You need to pull your head out the ground, if capitalism was unimpeded we'd have monopolies or cartels everywhere

In fact if you find yourself surrounded by monopolies and have little market choice it's far more likely you're in a communist state, not a capitalist one.

[Ocean1]

However assigning a value to stuff to make sure lots of other people get less so that a very few can get more doesn't sound like a very human centric approach to me.

Yeah. 'Cause the only reason we value shit is to make sure all the poor people don't get rich.




Fuckwit.

[mashman]

Yeah. 'Cause the only reason we value shit is to make sure all the poor people don't get rich.

Fuckwit.

Why does there have to be a solitary reason? I've no doubt that that's one of the reasons for a financial economy that vastly overrates itself.

Love you.

[Ocean1]

Why does there have to be a solitary reason? I've no doubt that that's one of the reasons for a financial economy that vastly overrates itself.

Love you.

There y'go, anthropomorphising your bogyman insecurities again. A financial economy doesn't have "reasons" and it doesn't rate itself, what, not being an aware entity an' all.

It's people, rating stuff that's the reason for a financial economy, not the other way around.

[Ocean1]

Think this belongs here: http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/heal...spiracy-belief

[mashman]

There y'go, anthropomorphising your bogyman insecurities again. A financial economy doesn't have "reasons" and it doesn't rate itself, what, not being an aware entity an' all.

It's people, rating stuff that's the reason for a financial economy.

Not aware? As far as I know there's some rather interesting technology being used in the stock market to lie, cheat and generally take the human risk out of making money. These things read twitter feeds and monitor social media and the stock market reacts. It is very much aware blind old scaredy... always has been.

I get that bit. It's an old white mans idea of how to run an economy. It has had its day. Can't wait for it to be gone.

[mashman]

Think this belongs here: http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/heal...spiracy-belief

Clinical psychologist Darshani Kumareswaran is delving in to the psychology of conspiracy belief, and has found some believers are likely to endorse far-fetched plots in an effort to make sense of chaotic situations beyond their control.

It is because the acts are happening in a supposed decent civilised age that conspiracy theorists are asking question and people are getting away with murder. Thanks for playing, next.

[Ocean1]

Not aware? As far as I know there's some rather interesting technology being used in the stock market to lie, cheat and generally take the human risk out of making money. These things read twitter feeds and monitor social media and the stock market reacts. It is very much aware blind old scaredy... always has been.

Data mining? That makes an economy aware? How very Orwellian.

And utterly wrong, of course. Perhaps you should break out the dictionary.

See it's not the economy using wholesale data, it's people. And no doubt some of 'em are lying and cheating, stupid people often do, but in fact the gathering of data isn't actually required to tell lies or to cheat, so why would liars and cheats bother?

I get that bit. It's an old white mans idea of how to run an economy. It has had its day. Can't wait for it to be gone.

You don't have a choice cookie boy, economies like ours are hugely successful, they're here to stay.

And I'll point out, again, that you successfully use and benefit from it every day. More: in paying for goods and services and accepting payment for same you prove every day that it works just fine. That, and the fact that you're a roaring hypocrite.

[Ocean1]

It is because the acts are happening in a supposed decent civilised age that conspiracy theorists are asking question and people are getting away with murder. Thanks for playing, next.

It is because they're fucked in the head. You can tell them at a thousand yards because they use quotes completely contradicting their arguments.

Here, have some relevant quotes:

You don't have to be mad to create conspiracy theories, but it certainly helps, new research suggests.

Just believing in them indicates you are more likely to be paranoid or mentally ill, a Victoria University study shows.

Widely held conspiracy theories range from harmless ones, such as the belief that the Moon landings were faked, to more dangerous delusions such as the one in Nigeria that polio vaccines were a Western plot to sterilise people. That led to vaccination crews being murdered and thousands dying from disease.

Clinical psychologist Darshani Kumareswaran is delving in to the psychology of conspiracy belief, and has found some believers are likely to endorse far-fetched plots in an effort to make sense of chaotic situations beyond their control.