Stupid World

[mashman]

That's a worry - and next then they will be pushing for pedophilia rights and marriage.

I guess those who need to protect themselves will find ways to keep on protecting themselves.

[Ocean1]

That's easy ... DonKey's answer is:

because there aren't enough politicians who agree to pass the law ...

Which is an excellent answer. Let's face it Stupid World would really toss their collective toys if the answer was: "yeah, me and a couple of like minded dudes decided".

Your nothing if not inconsistent.

[Brian d marge]

Which is an excellent answer. Let's face it Stupid World would really toss their collective toys if the answer was: "yeah, me and a couple of like minded dudes decided".

Your nothing if not inconsistent.

Without your consistancy where would we be

[mashman]

Which is an excellent answer. Let's face it Stupid World would really toss their collective toys if the answer was: "yeah, me and a couple of like minded dudes decided".

Your nothing if not inconsistent.

It's what happens. Nothing new about it.

[Ocean1]

It's what happens. Nothing new about it.

No it doesn't. All significant law changes are subject to house vote, you're injured majority facade is so full of cracks it's laughable.

[Scuba_Steve]

No it doesn't. All significant law changes are subject to house vote, you're injured majority facade is so full of cracks it's laughable.

So a "me & a few like minded dudes" decision

[Banditbandit]

Which is an excellent answer. Let's face it Stupid World would really toss their collective toys if the answer was: "yeah, me and a couple of like minded dudes decided".

Your nothing if not inconsistent.

No it doesn't. All significant law changes are subject to house vote, you're injured majority facade is so full of cracks it's laughable.

WTF ???? You're making BIG assumptions about which side of this argument I/we sit on ..

[mashman]

No it doesn't. All significant law changes are subject to house vote, you're injured majority facade is so full of cracks it's laughable.

What the fulla below me said

So a "me & a few like minded dudes" decision

You must have it wrong... else Oceans report is bullshit. To be fair I'm leaning towards Oceans report being bullshit

[mashman]

China's richest man loses $15 billion... wonder how many job losses that'll result in.

[Zedder]

China's richest man loses $15 billion... wonder how many job losses that'll result in.

His company is probably a front for producing the drug precursor Contact NT so they'll just start up again under something else...

[oldrider]

Yemen confusion - which terrorist is which?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyUX7e7g_Zs

[Scuba_Steve]

Peer review... Success

In the past few years more professionals have come forward to share a truth that, for many people, proves difficult to swallow. One such authority is Dr. Richard Horton, the current editor-in-chief of the Lancet – considered to be one of the most well respected peer-reviewed medical journals in the world.

Dr. Horton recently published a statement declaring that a lot of published research is in fact unreliable at best, if not completely false.

“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”

...

Dr. Marcia Angell, a physician and longtime Editor in Chief of the New England Medical Journal (NEMJ), which is considered to another one of the most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals in the world, makes her view of the subject quite plain:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine”

[mashman]

People are outraged about a Kansas law that critics are calling a 'tax on the poor'

California water cuts move to those with century-old rights

"When the state cutback order comes, the farmers will immediately try to block it in court, he said."... , because we must provide food for people who are dying of thirst .

[mashman]

His company is probably a front for producing the drug precursor Contact NT so they'll just start up again under something else...

Nah, if it was drug related they'd be protected from having to do such things .

[oldrider]

The many faces of US foreign policy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wNb2wJB3lY -