Sure it is. Take away the requirement to pay for stuff and the poor people will get all the good shit.Originally Posted by mashman
Fuck that.
Bogeyman
Sure it is. Take away the requirement to pay for stuff and the poor people will get all the good shit.
Fuck that.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Anorak
8 year waiting list, headlights optional
13 year waiting list
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Just faidin away!
What other purpose does production have but to be consumed - political persuasion, social standing, religion etc etc of the consumer should not relative!
Bogeyman
Trabant innit?
The main reason people queued up to immigrate to communist Germany.
I think the last of them had actual windscreen wipers! You cranked the wee handle over the windscreen.
Or maybe that was a Russian beastie... http://www.economist.com/node/11703067
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Bogeyman
Just one: gainful employment.
You mean they shouldn't preclude consumption?- political persuasion, social standing, religion etc etc of the consumer should not relative!
Obviously, as long as the consumer can pay the producer for the product.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Just faidin away!
Sorry I thought you said - Take away the requirement to pay for stuff and the poor people will get all the good shit. = level playing field!
Anorak
Of course in this perfect system with these systems, even though everyone's equal, some are just more equal than others comrade.
The main reason people queued up to immigrate to communist Germany.
I think the last of them had actual windscreen wipers! You cranked the wee handle over the windscreen.
Or maybe that was a Russian beastie... http://www.economist.com/node/11703067
But everyone's equal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZiL
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Aio ki te Aorangi
Will they? You mean the guy who imports TV's won't have a say in who gets what? I'm sure all of his rich mates will get the goods before the poor. You do likes your fear porn though eh.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Bogeyman
Well it would be a level field. When the poor people earned enough to pay the same as everyone else.Sorry I thought you said - Take away the requirement to pay for stuff and the poor people will get all the good shit. = level playing field!
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Bogeyman
Oh aye, not that they had a monopoly on hypocrisy, but the ideology is certainly based on saying one thing and doing another.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Bogeyman
What, he gets to dictate who buys his TVs now?
News to me, I thought the only barrier to buying stuff was earning enough to afford it.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Just faidin away!
Wouldn't that be more about opportunity rather than consumption - consumption would then have become a bi-product of opportunity - wouldn't it?
Bogeyman
You need an opportunity to earn money?Wouldn't that be more about opportunity rather than consumption - consumption would then have become a bi-product of opportunity - wouldn't it?
I had no idea.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Aio ki te Aorangi
Why not. Free will and a free market n all that.
Buying stuff? Short memory much
Anorak
Idealists miss the reality of situations....it sounds good on paper, but that's the same thing money is printed on
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks