"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Yes, at the time he perceived that I was not doing that, & although I am often in the position of charging him for services, he was still very forthcoming with advice, which has no doubt cost him in the long run.
I often find that older folk with few apparent financial restrictions have the better advice than people with little more than a chip on their shoulder & an axe to grind.
And when I've pointed out where the same systems have failed to work in the past you've fallen back on obfuscation, vague inferences to even vaguer references and the insistence that I don't understand. Like now.
Doesn't make you any more correct now than you were then. Why don't you simply accept the opinion of the majority of observers that what you propose is completely impractical, ethically questionable, that you don't actually know what you're talking about and that you should quietly fuck off?
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Not convinced it's not simply an artificially constricted market. Only, ask yourself what difference there would be if all of the houses that should have been built 20 years ago for prices reflecting the cost to supply were now on the market.
As for banks, maybe teh govt orta fuck with the actual reserve. 17% ain't it? What would happen if they made it 20%?
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
He wasn't of that opinion when I was contracting design services to them a decade ago.
He's right, but the other half of a stable market needs to be there too: competition. If there's restrictions on who can supply shit, or the prices is regulated then "as much as the market can reliably stand" rapidly becomes somewhat farcical.
Unless you're name is mushbrain. Then it's all good.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
When you apply it like a child, it's called learning stuff without understanding. I'd say get back in your playpen, but I see you never left.
I thought I heard Pavlov waking up.
That's because you, ironically, ignore the advantages of what we have on the grounds that you deserve. They never failed. They were usurped. Seriously, watch the Varoufakis video. Where in the contract do I get to tell you all to fuck off without then having you deny me land, food, healthcare etc... and all on some misguided notion that I deserve nothing? I, NOW, object to the way we're currently living for very valid reasons. You choose not to see the reasoning. I cannot help that, as I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you. Meh, not sure why you got a more than 1 line response there tbh.
The Parable of the Pub. Learn it, and you'll learn the answer to your question.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I'll take that as leveled at me. You are doing exactly what this economic model expects you to do. Why should I judge you for that. It is perfectly sound advice, an advice that allows capitalism to function. In very much the same way that Ocean states his economic point of view, no point in judging him, because it works in the system that we have. A system that is slowly decaying. By all means ignore the decaying, but don;t for a minute expect that some of us are gonna roll over and play dead because you like capitalism. It ain't a chip on my shoulder that drives me, I have no axe to grind (We PM'd about such), it's logical, reasonable and common sense, yet it's a real mindfuck when you actually come to grasp just how easy it is to change. The hard part is watching you guys accept what is as the best we can do. You're wrong.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
And sidecar bob isn't broke, hence economics judging him favorably and not in need of fixing
Yet you're one of the most notorious people on the site for not understanding shit, is that why you shy from books, you don't know how to apply their contents like an adult? Adult's would discuss a subject and further their understanding that way, children get told what to learn and how to learn it; we can all see which category you fall into.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
ahhh. bring on the day when all you old white niggers are dead.
DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks