Stupid World

[bogan]

I realise that he isn't.

I tried to discuss it with you several years ago. Yet you still blame me for your lack of understandings when I claim that you have misunderstood what I've said. Your ASSumptions are yours champ and they always have been.

Or is it that you blaming somebody's lack of understanding is just a cop out for your own inability to understand a thing? When two people come to a different understanding about a thing, what do you think the best way to rectify that and reach a greater, shared understanding is? clam up and make sweeping assumptions about each other's inability to understand the subject? or discuss the subject as rational adults, answering each others questions and the like? This thread is filled with examples of you and other stupid worlders doing the former; perhaps at least try the latter, you might learn something. Then again, that's probably why you won't try it, stupid worlders do prioritise their self delusions over a selfless understanding.

Lose the subjectivity and gain some objectivity mashy.

[mashman]

Or is it that you blaming somebody's lack of understanding is just a cop out for your own inability to understand a thing? When two people come to a different understanding about a thing, what do you think the best way to rectify that and reach a greater, shared understanding is? clam up and make sweeping assumptions about each other's inability to understand the subject? or discuss the subject as rational adults, answering each others questions and the like? This thread is filled with examples of you and other stupid worlders doing the former; perhaps at least try the latter, you might learn something. Then again, that's probably why you won't try it, stupid worlders do prioritise their self delusions over a selfless understanding.

Lose the subjectivity and gain some objectivity mashy.

Sigh. I have explained it to a number of people. They understand it. Some in minutes. Some over hours. Some over years. Stupid World stands as it is, but not solely for the reasons you think. Tis a personal thing for why one posts. At a fundamental level, I believe most of the posts to be informative in some way or other... but that's because I choose to see them that way. You choose to believe that I see them negatively. Your projection is noted and summarily laughed at before dismissal takes place.

bwaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa... NOW that is a new level of irony.

[bogan]

Sigh. I have... They... you think... Tis a personal thing... I believe ... because I choose... You choose... I see them...Your projection...

That's not a good attempt at losing subjectivity there mashy

[mashman]

One in three Saudi air raids on Yemen hit civilian sites, data shows.. what bullshit through yonder window breaks.

[mashman]

That's not a good attempt at losing subjectivity there mashy

bwaaaaaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaa... I'm not claiming to be objective. Thanks for the projection.

[bogan]

bwaaaaaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaa... I'm not claiming to be objective. Thanks for the projection.

Perhaps you should make more of an effort to be, losing the focus on oneself is objectively essential in gaining a balanced perspective.

[mashman]

Perhaps you should make more of an effort to be, losing the focus on oneself is objectively essential in gaining a balanced perspective.

bwaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

[bogan]

bwaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

I find myself wondering, when you type such cop outs, do they in any way reflect the reality of your reaction?

[mashman]

I find myself wondering, when you type such cop outs, do they in any way reflect the reality of your reaction?

Oh, I thought you were trying to be funny by removing the context and focusing solely on the words used... in the context of objectivity that is. But as you were wondering, it was more of a brain lmfaorofllolrofllmao accompanied with a few chuckles. There was no flailing of limbs as your picture shows. Except there was a big grin involved. Close, but no BMW

[bogan]

Oh, I thought you were trying to be funny by removing the context and focusing solely on the words used... in the context of objectivity that is. But as you were wondering, it was more of a brain lmfaorofllolrofllmao accompanied with a few chuckles. There was no flailing of limbs as your picture shows. Except there was a big grin involved. Close, but no BMW

The words used betrayed the contextual subjectivity. Objectivity cannot be demonstrated while using such subjective narration, now can it?

Oh, and it is heartening to hear you have no BMW, the peasantry are not worthy of them.

[Ocean1]

Where in the contract do I get to tell you all to fuck off without then having you deny me land, food, healthcare etc... and all on some misguided notion that I deserve nothing?

Where does it say you get to depend on someone else paying for your land, food, healthcare etc?

Only, really, you deserve what you create, and fuck all else.

[mashman]

The words used betrayed the contextual subjectivity. Objectivity cannot be demonstrated while using such subjective narration, now can it?

Oh, and it is heartening to hear you have no BMW, the peasantry are not worthy of them.

If you say so.

[mashman]

Where does it say you get to depend on someone else paying for your land, food, healthcare etc?

Only, really, you deserve what you create, and fuck all else.

rofl@paying.

[Ocean1]

rofl@paying.

Precisely.

[Voltaire]

Hows the campaign trail going?

Lots of election stuff on up here but how do people vote?

Theres a name that sounds familiar.

Theres a name I can pronounce

Phil Goff.....didn't he ride a Triumph, can't be all bad.

I can't decide between Citizens and Ratepayers or Indifference and Apathy