Stupid World

[TheDemonLord]

Both wings, same bird, same lies, same nothing happening other than business growth around the world and a president to enforce his will upon the globe.

Globalist: a person who advocates the interpretation or planning of economic and foreign policy in relation to events and developments throughout the world.

Trump is a globalist. All denial is stupidity. Oh, and if you think there's something wrong with being a globalist, then you need to be whacked with that printed copy of agenda 21 again. But it was funny to watch you spurt out meme's in his defense thinking that being a globalist is a bad thing. Being a useless twat of a human is a bad thing... but that's why you follow who you follow. I love your desperation.

I don't personally take as much objection to the term Globalist as others, but it is clear that Trump is not a Globalist in the traditional sense. He has withdrawn US troops from overseas, he has engaged in protectionist actions for the US economy, He has withdrawn from international treaties.

The only 'globalist' part of Trump is that he wants to do business with the world, but that is not the same as wanting to be in control of the world.

That you would try and claim it when it's patently clear he isn't is delusional.

[Katman]

The only 'globalist' part of Trump is that he wants to do business with the world, but that is not the same as wanting to be in control of the world.

And anyone assuming that the globalist term 'One World Government' equates to America being "in control of the world" is ignoring the big fat Zionist elephant in the room.

[oldrider]

And anyone assuming that the globalist term 'One World Government' equates to America being "in control of the world" is ignoring the big fat Zionist elephant in the room.

Totally agree with and support that statement. -

[Viking01]

http://www.williamengdahl.com/englishNEO29Oct2019.php

No doubt it will be very extensively trialed within the US before being
released more widely around the world. Instead of their usual tests
"on the quiet" in India beforehand.

And that there will be suitable warnings on foods to advise consumers.

Best of all, it sounds very profitable. What's not to like?

What could possibly go wrong ?

[oldrider]

FYInformation only - make of it what you will? - - or not!

-

[mashman]

In the war on plastic is Coca-Cola friend or foe?...

What does a business do when a business knows that it is unsustainable and is highly likely to be unsustainable into the future, and knows it? The positive spin is a cute though... yes, we'll still producing 100+ billion pointless plastic bottles each year, but 40 billion of those will be used more than once, so all good yeah. Coca-cola serves no life purpose. The business should not exist.

[oldrider]

In the war on plastic is Coca-Cola friend or foe?...

What does a business do when a business knows that it is unsustainable and is highly likely to be unsustainable into the future, and knows it? The positive spin is a cute though... yes, we'll still producing 100+ billion pointless plastic bottles each year, but 40 billion of those will be used more than once, so all good yeah. Coca-cola serves no life purpose. The business should not exist.

That's just a bit too ideologically narrow - think of all the work and income that they produce while providing a product that according to your theory nobody wants?

It may not be "needed" but for something that is not needed it sure satisfies a major commercial demand.

There are people out there that espouse that the "human race should not exist" - now that will not benefit mankind much either will it? -

[mashman]

That's just a bit too ideologically narrow - think of all the work and income that they produce while providing a product that according to your theory nobody wants?

Tsk tsk John. There's nothing ideological about the facts. It's fizzy flavoured water, and a personal fave I might add... however it is not a sustainable practice and has to go on those grounds alone. I Am more than aware of the economic ramifications of doing what needs to be done, coz if we don't try the sustainable thing, it is pretty much certain death. There is no ideology in that, just facts... put ideology down and try engaging brain, because that is all that is required.

It may not be "needed" but for something that is not needed it sure satisfies a major commercial demand.

And because it satisfies a major commercial demand it's ok to continue with that business? Like child trafficking for instance. There is a major demand for it, because it exists and keeps on existing, and all because it makes some people money whilst the "pervs" get their kicks. That is completely fucked logic!... albeit the current cultural ideological standpoint, because it completely ignores reality in favour of keeping things the way they are because "we" like them that way. I can only assume you were being sarcastic.

There are people out there that espouse that the "human race should not exist" - now that will not benefit mankind much either will it? -

No it won't... neither will consuming our way through a finite planet and nearly 2 planets per year guarantee much of a future... but please feel free to ignore that inconvenient truth as some ideological standpoint that is entirely divorced from all evidence, logic, reason and common sense.

Tsk tsk.................. hardly surprising we go nowhere when we can dismiss the evidence because it's bad for business and no other reason. Stupid World at its very finest.

[Woodman]

In the war on plastic is Coca-Cola friend or foe?...

What does a business do when a business knows that it is unsustainable and is highly likely to be unsustainable into the future, and knows it? The positive spin is a cute though... yes, we'll still producing 100+ billion pointless plastic bottles each year, but 40 billion of those will be used more than once, so all good yeah. Coca-cola serves no life purpose. The business should not exist.

Somehow sustainability should be part of a constitution type agreement that all businesses have to adhere to. The likes of corps the size of Coca-Cola have too much clout with the politicians for just normal type regulations to be effective.

Oh and Trump needs shooting.

[onearmedbandit]

Like child trafficking for instance. There is a major demand for it, because it exists and keeps on existing, and all because it makes some people money whilst the "pervs" get their kicks. That is completely fucked logic!...

No comparing child trafficking to the sales of Coca Cola is fucked logic. And 'major demand'? Not where I live...

[mashman]

Somehow sustainability should be part of a constitution type agreement that all businesses have to adhere to. The likes of corps the size of Coca-Cola have too much clout with the politicians for just normal type regulations to be effective.

Oh and Trump needs shooting.

Businesses cannot survive the way we are going. The article and coca-cola themselves are highlighting the issues of sharing a limited resource pool to compete in the same market. There simply isn't the resource to maintain anywhere business as usual where sustainability becomes a part of anything. Even if coca-cola was split up into more competitive units to prevent political intereference, they'd still be producing the same amount of product and we'd still be unsustainable. It kind of needs to stop.

No comparing child trafficking to the sales of Coca Cola is fucked logic. And 'major demand'? Not where I live...

True, people are free to choose to drink coke from a plastic bottle and children that are trafficked are so against their will. In terms of commercial demand, the revenues are, depending on what you read, approximately the same with the child trafficking potentially being the bigger earner in the wider economy. Throw in the rest of the forced labour market and "forced" labour takes the win over coca-cola by a military mile in terms of (even if you add in canned coke and every other product that coca-cola makes), well everything apart from satisfying the thirst of a larger number of customers. But sure, go ahead and ignore that fact solely on the basis of the ... and thanks for proving that yet another KBer is incapable of rational thought or indeed the most basic of research. S'ok though, I'm a wanker, so just ignore the fact that tens of millions suffer at the hands of dirty little grubby bastards just coz I did the legwork and passed on the relevant information. You must live under a fuckin' rock eh mate.

[onearmedbandit]

But sure, go ahead and ignore that fact solely on the basis of the ... and thanks for proving that yet another KBer is incapable of rational thought or indeed the most basic of research. S'ok though, I'm a wanker, so just ignore the fact that tens of millions suffer at the hands of dirty little grubby bastards just coz I did the legwork and passed on the relevant information. You must live under a fuckin' rock eh mate.

Oh my god, listen to yourself. So full of ignorant assumption.

[mashman]

Oh my god, listen to yourself. So full of ignorant assumption.

I thought it a wee work of art to see if you still respond in the same ways. Ya see, you deride a certain thing, get shown otherwise, and then focus on the purposefully placed insult. Tis still an amusing thing to do to this day, but sad to see you all still fail... well, most of you. When given the option to play the man, you guys continue to choose to play the man. Yeah, it's a silly game to play, but it's far easier to find out where the "chat" is likely to go than continuing to play the, who can play the man better game. Oh, and go fuck yourself <3

[onearmedbandit]

I thought it a wee work of art to see if you still respond in the same ways. Ya see, you deride a certain thing, get shown otherwise, and then focus on the purposefully placed insult. Tis still an amusing thing to do to this day, but sad to see you all still fail... well, most of you. When given the option to play the man, you guys continue to choose to play the man. Yeah, it's a silly game to play, but it's far easier to find out where the "chat" is likely to go than continuing to play the, who can play the man better game. Oh, and go fuck yourself <3

Dude you are well and truly overthinking it.

[mashman]

Dude you are well and truly overthinking it.

And your mum loved next doors cat and that's why you have fur behind your ears.

After the last decade+ on KB and given the bullshit that's been thrown my way, I've found that is it an exceptionally sound strategy when it comes to things as important as millions of kids are being bought and sold... coz not everyone knows the scale, or cares to know, some see it as a conspiracy that can never happen, and yet more seem to want to get angry at me for posting that truth. Meh.

And thanks again for telling me what I'm thinking and just that I am in to overthinking territory .