"More rational climate scenarios don’t give any excuse for complacency. But they do give human civilization a fighting chance.".
And yet not a mention of why the pollutants are in the air and land and water i.e. the production of shite that serves no life purpose.
It is wholly rational to stop the economic activity that is causing the problem in the first place. If that's not on the menu, then success will be limited and everything will die. There are no ifs ands or buts in regards to that being a requirement, because the energy saved by stopping that economic activity will be massive... and I do mean massive. All of a sudden gas and coal last longer and so on. But they're not even talking about it, which shows just how irrational their solutions still are. Perhaps they don't understand the nature of the problem, which they don't, because capitalistic activity requires the polluting to take place, else there's too little resource to float any market.
Selling bits of planet for profit does not encourage the inhabitants of that planet to live within the means of the planet nor indeed their own individual means in any way shape or form. The evidence proves this without question... and where we cut the required production, so no financial system, and therefore capitalism, will be able to survive. If ya cannae get that through yer thick skull, then you truly are fucked in the head, because you are denying the actuals and the history that produced those actuals. But each to their own evidence eh........
Knowing the science means fuck all if your economy is ill-equipped to handle what's coming given that those running the show think that capitalism has to survive. That is a limit (in thinking if nothing else) set by stupid people. It's stupid, be cause nature really doesn't give a fuck about limits that men set. The sooner men realise this, the sooner we'll start moving in the right direction for that fighting chance to become a reality.
Bookmarks