Not as brutal as you think. If someone is fired on bad terms, the first thing you do is immediately lock out any and all access that they have.
That's to limit:
1: The damage a pissed off staff member could potentially do
2: The Liability for them to be blamed for something
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
No, that is called 'The Hecklers Veto':
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heckler%27s_veto
Checkmark status currently is 'reserved' for high profile account, All of whom could easily afford $8. So why the complaint from Multi-Millionaires about an $8 charge?Freedom of speech, on campuses and elsewhere, is rendered meaningless if speakers can be shouted down by those who disagree. The law is well established that the government can act to prevent a heckler’s veto -- to prevent the reaction of the audience from silencing the speaker. There is simply no 1st Amendment right to go into an auditorium and prevent a speaker from being heard, no matter who the speaker is or how strongly one disagrees with his or her message.
Because the regular person can also afford $8 and when the regular people no longer have the same status as the 'elites' with their special marks, noting them for their prominence, they will loose their status symbol.
"When everyone is special, no one is"
I'd say that's a far more likely reason than saying someone who earned $500K a year, can't afford $8 a month.
We will indeed see.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
Elon the thinskinned has banned a comedian for impersonating him, even though her handle was still showing.
if she had impersonated say a certain cave rescue expert, she probably would of earned a cheeky Elon response. As she impersonated him, banned!
https://www.foxbusiness.com/entertai...-elon-musk.amp
"Despite her handle showing her own @kathygriffin name, the moniker by her blue checkmark said "Elon Musk" "
I'll admit, I'm conflicted on this one - on the one hand, the policy is completely reasonable - if you have a Blue Check mark and change your name, people will be mislead (and Kathy Griffin isn't funny)
However, after the hilarity that was Justice Dankula and when he impersonated a British Peer, I will kinda miss it...
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
I think he is in training to become a politician.
The $8 fee is to weed out bots and fake accounts as will be too hard if they need seperate credit card numbers. It’s well known that click farms staffed by peasant salve labour in India sell likes and followers. From memory you could buy 1000 Facebook/Twitter “likes/followers” for about $80.
I seen it in real time with a photographer dude who went overnight from about 7 followers (mum, dad, auntie couple mates etc) that is usual for a new account overnight to 10,007 followers where it stagnated and never grew much from.
The left (and prob right) has routinely used these facilities to make certain agendas look like issue of the day....
Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer
"Going forward, any Twitter handles engaging in impersonation without clearly specifying ‘parody’ will be permanently suspended," he wrote Sunday night.
"Previously, we issued a warning before suspension, but now that we are rolling out widespread verification, there will be no warning. This will be clearly identified as a condition for signing up to Twitter Blue."
Perhaps people will think twice about trying to change their name to test the rule in future. It's an easy task to automate. Click save and the rule triggers a ban. Company policy completely depersonalised lol. People pointing the finger at any individual need their head read... or an IT course or something.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Really Mashy the individual that got their panties in knot was the one parodied. they were the one that instigated the ban that's why they also made sure to let the public know why it happened. that why it says "GOING FORWARD"
But it maters not he owns the platform he can do a he wishes (within the laws)
But rest assured people if they don't like his platform will vote with their feet as will the advertisers.
Musk had to buy twitter as she couldn't back out. it was before the courts
its losing over 4 us million dollars a day or over 3 billion a year and he paid 44 billion for it that he needs to pay back.
on top of all of this he's alienated a lot of people that pay to advertise on the platform.
on top of this hes secured the deal borrowing directly against his tesla stock which has plummeted losing him 30 billion dollars and counting
Even after the SEC fined Musk $20 million for posting an allegedly misleading tweet about his plan to take Tesla private, Musk continued to push the limits of his settlement by posting unauthorized tweets — a risk the world’s richest man could afford to take.
So when Musk changed his mind about buying Twitter, many believed he would somehow get out of it, even if his legal justification seemed flimsy. But this time, Musk didn’t get out of it. That’s because, in large part, of the Delaware Court of Chancery, the business court overseeing Twitter’s lawsuit against Musk.if he had the world would have seen more of his texts to his matesOn October 3, Musk's legal team informed Twitter that Musk had changed his mind and decided to move forward with his proposed acquisition at the originally agreed-upon price of $54.20 per share, on the condition that Twitter drop its lawsuit.The reason for this reversal was attributed to concerns from Musk's team that they would not be able to prove that there was a material adverse effect justifying a break from contract
https://www.theatlantic.com/technolo...dorsey/671619/
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
FTX: Cryptocurrency giant Binance walks away from bailout
lollies... coz crypto is gonna produce a financial system that works. We're doooooooooomed, doooooooooomed I tell ye.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer
Bankman-Fried Warns: Some Crypto Exchanges Already “Secretly Insolvent” (back in June)
"But, despite the generous bailouts, not even Bankman-Fried is able, or willing, to throw good money after bad in perpetuity. “There are companies that are basically too far gone and it's not practical to backstop them for reasons like a substantial hole in the balance sheet, regulatory issues, or that there is not much of a business left to be saved,” says Bankman-Fried, who declined to name any specific crypto exchanges."
"Despite the carnage, Bankman-Fried tells Forbes that FTX remains profitable and has been for the past 10 quarters. FTX’s biggest rival Coinbase lost $432 million in the first quarter of 2022 and its stock is down almost 90% from its all-time high."
Oh the Lol-lies that people tell themselves and the papers and so on. Suddenly his surname takes on a whole new meaning.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Elon Musk has realised he is destroying Twitter and that its demise is imminent. He is looking for a new CEO to run the company. He will need to find one who hasn't read what it's like to work with him. Things like getting an angry call at 3.00AM, "I'm at the office, where are you?"
That has the ring of truth since his immediate solution to the problems he has caused at Twitter is to sleep in the office so he can cause problems 24/7.
https://www.techspot.com/news/96653-...OILB9tGF_-uB5A
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
Well as much as I think Elon's an idiot at times it's hardly surprising that one of the most driven individuals has high expectations of those around him and employed by him...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks