Pure fantasy. Like most of the other things you believe.Originally Posted by TheDemonLord
Geriatric hoon
Pure fantasy. Like most of the other things you believe.
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
The Majestic Metal Wizard
So, a Democrat Congressman saying that it's against the first Amendment is pure fantasy?
I mean, bold strategy, I'll give you that...
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
Geriatric hoon
Ignoring that because it's irrelevant. Read the 1A and you'll understand. Sorry, I forgot who I'm addressing.
Seriously, I think you should seek professional help. Your grasp of reality is exceedingly tenuous.
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
The Majestic Metal Wizard
Okay...
There, now everyone has read it.Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
If a Government Agency and Government actors use a 3rd party to abridge the freedom of speech and the freedom of the Press (The NY Post would be considered part of 'the press') - is that in the spirit of the First Amendment?
And before you go 'Huuuurrrr Durr they haven't made a law, so doesn't count' - let's look at the precedent set by Marsh vs Alabama - Congress passed no law in that case either, but the Supreme Court held that (And I quote):
This is why the lawsuit against Trump blocking people on Twitter was found to be a first amendment issue - the right to petition the Government for a redress of grievance - again, no law passed by Congress and also on a privately owned (Twitter) property, but opened for use by the public in general.the more an owner, for his advantage, opens up his property for use by the public in general, the more do his rights become circumscribed by the statutory and constitutional rights of those who use it.
So, we have a long and well established legal principle here that the 1st Amendment applies (in certain instances) to privately owned institutions (Not just the Government institutions) and it does not require any law passed for a violation to occur.
Therefore getting a private company to do the governments dirty work is entirely against the principles of the 1st Amendment.
I knew it, The Right knew it, Elon knew it, Even Democratic Congressmen knew it.
Suffice to say, I think the insults are merely a diversionary tactic at best and outright projection at worst.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
Anorak
Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna the story seemed to be "a violation of the 1st Amendment principles."
so i assume old i know more than the supreme court the FBI and the NZ mental health foundation still has not yet grasped the meaning of words like seemed....
if he thinks they suit his opinion.....
if someone was convinced it was they don't use the word seemed..."so as to give the impression of having a certain quality; apparently."
to appear to the observation or understanding
: to give the impression of being
give the impression of being something or having a particular quality
appeared to be something, especially when this is not true
to give the effect of being; to be judged to be:
to appear to be true, probable, or evident:
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Kruger-Dunning Parts n Service
The infamous John Cardogan backs up what I said and more about the teslasemi joke
Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer
Fair weather rider
Yes, because according to his website he's a "verified" auto expert, he's got a stamp with verified twice, he even has his own signature under his own auto expert verification badge!
What was I thinking investing hundreds of thousands of dollars into Tesla when I could have invested it all in on this "verified" auto expert !!
https://autoexpert.com.au/
Who needs Elons self driving cars and trucks?Or rockets landing from space when we can have a self proclaimed verified auto expert!
...lol.
The Majestic Metal Wizard
It's funny, because the Supreme Court has been agreeing with me quite a lot of late... I guess I really did know more than the previous Supreme Court
And the FBI have been showing their partisan nature...
And NZ Mental Health - well, have you decided if Men commit Suicide at a rate more than Women yet? Cause you seemed to be unable to understand that when your own data showed that this was the case, multiple times over. And if you can't understand the links you post, that hardly qualifies you to judge. Also, I seem to recall my point was that the Mental Health foundation was Woke and so their opinions were tainted. A quick check of their website shows the current buzzwords:
So yeah, I am right.poverty, racism, colonisation, discrimination,
Back to the matter at hand, considering his use of the word 'Violation' which is a pretty strong and definitive word - when taken together, it's pretty clear that the rep thinks that what is going on is egregious enough that it could be an outright breach of the 1A. Even if it is not a technical breach (that is sufficient for a SCOTUS ruling, that it's close enough to the line to be improper - and it's that last bit that is key.
Even if it's not an actual breach, it's close enough to the line to be an issue - the Democrat rep knew this and so did everyone else.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
Fair weather rider
Don't forget to fill the form on his link to his book
Who needs to save 10s of thousands in fuel cost by buying a Tesla when you can save a couple of thousand dollars buying a prehistoric gas guzzler!
https://autoexpert.com.au/contact
Brilliant absolutely brilliant!!
Kruger-Dunning Parts n Service
Not only do you’ve have less range but a 5 ton loss in payload due to weight of battery system vs a Diesel engine and fuel tanks....
Just like some Cali’ startup they are full of trump style hyperbole claims but the only things of substance are wireless charging for your phone and room to stand up and put your overalls on inside cab ���������� did they talk to any real truck drivers during RnD?
Ohhh and paging our resident sparkie please.... with regard to the infrastructure required to fast charge 700kWh into a battery in 30mins please. Apparently the average residential American housecuses 886kWh per Monthso that’s a lot of angry pixies to jam down a wire in 30mins....
Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer
The Majestic Metal Wizard
Thunderf00t - now there is a name I have not heard in a while.
Good times.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
Fair weather rider
Then enlighten me how we are going to lower or meet our green house emissions target in the next decade or so?
Perhaps you want our farming industry, you know, our biggest export, the only industry that kept us afloat during the scamdemic taxed into non existence?
We need to figure out how to build the infrastructure, solar,wind ,etc to move to sustainable energy in EVs, not pretend hydrogen or whatever ones that haven't been invited yet, because there are now 8 million EVs world wide, tell anyone that 5 years ago they would have laughed.
Tesla will save our farming industry,our economy and our status as a first world developed country.
I always think we'll outside the square, I don't get my power dopamine hits from knocking people trying to make a difference in this world.
Kruger-Dunning Parts n Service
Well it seems high capacity fast charging is feasible but with high voltage battery packs. The numbers are crazy though, I don’t think truck drivers should be trusted with this kinda electricity. It’s got back to the future clock tower written all over it
https://www.batterypowertips.com/how...es-be-charged/
In the U.S., SAE J1772 recognizes three charging levels:
Level 1 uses 120 Vac input and is limited to about 1.9 kW, powering an onboard EV charger.
Level 2 is called “fast AC charging” and uses 208/240 Vac single-phase power to supply up to about 19 kW with a 240 VAC source. It charges up to seven times faster than Level 1.
Level 3 is DC fast charging and uses an external charger to deliver 240 kW using 600 Vdc and 400 A. Advanced designs can deliver 500 kW using 1,000 Vdc and 500 A.
Level 3 is still 50% short on EJ’s 70% capacity inn30 mins
Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer
Aio ki te Aorangi
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Fair weather rider
Did you actually read the article?
Or just the headline?
"Having said that, Switzerland would not opt for a blanket EV ban."
"Instead, under the new bill, electric car owners could use their cars for ‘essential’ trips only.".
There's a war in Europe, In WW2 they didn't ban people from eating, they were placed on food rationing
Seriously guys, what forum have I joined here?
There are some very intelligent bikers here and some it seems there education ended about year 8.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks