Unlike many media outlets Jo references all her sources and it’s not so much denials as exposing the lies and contradictions of the climate cult.
Often the climate cult talks about a consensus of scientists agreeing, hundreds have signed a letter etc….
If something is a scientificly proven it only needs two scientists to agree. The one producing the results and the one doing peer review who is able to repeat the same observations after experiment.
So if you want to talk about money, talk about scientists receiving climate research money paid by govts that benefit from the predetermined results.
Your right it is terrible that someone producing a form of news should be paid by one side of the debate. I’m mean the next most terrible thing would be for a govt to have a $50million slush fund paid only to journalists willing to report something based on certain criteria…
Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer
Bookmarks