I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
The HSC Act was passed 27 March 2012
"Crucially and most seriously, it removes the UK government’s obligation to provide universal healthcare in England, something so fundamental it amounts to the abolition of the NHS. As Dr Jacky Davis, co-chair of the NHS Consultants Association says: "After the passage of the unwanted, unneeded and deeply undemocratic NHS bill, we no longer have a national health service.""
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
why should poor people be a burden on rich peoples societies? If ya get sick and ya don't have a couple hundred thousand dollar/pound/euro/yen spare .....just die, and quietly please, so as to not disturb our beautiful minds.
squeek squeek
If you talking about merica then i would agree with you, but the problem here and in the UK it is slightly different.
All I can say is with the costs going up something has to give (personally I think feed the crims on $1 a day and used the rest for health care) and yes if you can afford it than private is better as not only does it speed up the process but it removes the burden from the public system so it isn't the big scary monster that you are trying to portray.
I know of plenty of people that have been through the public health system and have never been turned away from treatment because they can't afford treatment.
From that site you said made less sense than the fucked up link:
"Gradually, the government is starving the NHS of money. This is deliberate. As hospitals run out of money - and the exorbitant repayments on PFI deals are a major factor here - they become prey to takeovers by private companies. This has already happened, with Serco taking over Newmarket Hospital.
Not only does a private company cherry-pick profitable services but it gains infrastructure paid for by the taxpayer. It can also give preferential access to equipment such as kidney machines, blood and organs that were specifically donated by the public to the NHS for use by everyone."
Removes the burden from the public system? Myself and my family have been on the end of private healthcare in the UK and yes, the operations/consultancy/treatments received where received at an NHS public facility. So there is a burden on the public system, just one that very few seem to know about.
Edit: They actually lost my Step Dads records after him having been in hospital for 3 weeks. Originally they where confused as to why he had lost a pint of blood, so whacked in another pint only to find that it expanded the growth on his kidney to the size of a football. So he had to wait for his chemo whilst they hunted for his records. My Step Mum was also misdiagnosed with fibroid cysts, only to wake up 1 Saturday morning jaundiced and to die the following Thursday. Public or private is a bullshit argument when they're both supposed to be performing the same service and both can fuck up just as badly as the other. Fighting over resources will see more people die, especially when it's all down to how much $ you have. $ does not equal harder worker or better human being, but for some unknown reason the decision making fucktards of the world seem to think so... else there wouldn't be a need for multi-tiered service levels. Tis only gonna get worse when more and more of it becomes private.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks