Stupid World

[Ocean1]

NZ Productivity Commission to look at regulatory regimes

"This is the entity's sixth inquiry since it was set up in 2011 as part of an election deal between the National and Act parties, and modelled closely on its Australian counterpart.

The terms of reference seek recommendations to "improve the design of new regulatory regimes and make system-wide improvements to the operation of existing regulatory regimes in New Zealand."

A final report is due to the ministers by the end of June next year."

so did they get it wrong 5 times? Perhaps they didn't have long enough to figure out what they seem not to have a clue about and that's why they'll be waiting 11 months for an answer this time around.

It's terms of reference were limited to a single report? I don't understand why you have a problem with almost everything about our regulatory systems and yet you also apparently have a problem with an entity seeking to improve them. Especially as you don't have a clue about any changes they may have recommended. And in fact no clue about how regulatory systems are supposed to work in the first place.

[mashman]

It's terms of reference were limited to a single report? I don't understand why you have a problem with almost everything about our regulatory systems and yet you also apparently have a problem with an entity seeking to improve them. Especially as you don't have a clue about any changes they may have recommended. And in fact no clue about how regulatory systems are supposed to work in the first place.

The problem I have is that they don't seem to know what they're looking for or are doing, else why would you need 6 reports? If I was being nice I would assume that the first 5 were requirements gathering escapades. This is the reason we have a govt. To do these things for us. Not to seek very expensive advice every 5 minutes and outsource to the highest bidder and pull in whoever fits the bill. Regulatory systems are bullshit! Believing that commerce will be reigned in by rules and regulation is like hoping that the guy who's head you just shot off with a 12 guage is still going to be ok. Waste of time and energy, not to mention money. That's why I have the problem, or at least one of the reasons.

[Oscar]

The problem I have is that they don't seem to know what they're looking for or are doing, else why would you need 6 reports? If I was being nice I would assume that the first 5 were requirements gathering escapades. This is the reason we have a govt. To do these things for us. Not to seek very expensive advice every 5 minutes and outsource to the highest bidder and pull in whoever fits the bill. Regulatory systems are bullshit! Believing that commerce will be reigned in by rules and regulation is like hoping that the guy who's head you just shot off with a 12 guage is still going to be ok. Waste of time and energy, not to mention money. That's why I have the problem, or at least one of the reasons.

You assume?
Have you seen any off them?

You crap on about things you have no knowledge of.
You really don't have to keep proving that you're a childish wanker, we get it...

[mashman]

You assume?
Have you seen any off them?

You crap on about things you have no knowledge of.
You really don't have to keep proving that you're a childish wanker, we get it...

Yes I assume.
Any of What?

Knowledge of what?
Of course I do, coz you don't.

[Oscar]

Yes I assume.
Any of What?

Knowledge of what?
Of course I do, coz you don't.

And what does that mean?
Yes, I have read the five regulatory reviews, so I know of what I speak?
Or, more likely, that you like airing your half baked views on this forum.

So tell us - what types of regulatory reform are you in favour of?
What aspects of regulatory reform are being reviewed?

You haven't got a fucking clue, have you?

[mashman]

And what does that mean?
Yes, I have read the five regulatory reviews, so I know of what I speak?
Or, more likely, that you like airing your half baked views on this forum.

So tell us - what types of regulatory reform are you in favour of?
What aspects of regulatory reform are being reviewed?

You haven't got a fucking clue, have you?

What does what mean?
And that means what?

None of it is required. Tis just written wank for weak minded fools to follow. You prove the case well.

[Oscar]

What does what mean?
And that means what?

None of it is required. Tis just written wank for weak minded fools to follow. You prove the case well.

So you have nothing to add to your initial, childish and weak blertings?
You should stop commenting on subjects that you are ignorant of.

[mashman]

So you have nothing to add to your initial, childish and weak blertings?
You should stop commenting on subjects that you are ignorant of.

As should you.

[Oscar]

As should you.

The irony here is that the regulatory review affects some of your favourite subjects, but you're too stupid to realise it.

[mashman]

The irony here is that the regulatory review affects some of your favourite subjects, but you're too stupid to realise it.

Probably because I haven't read them... nothing to do with my stupidity in this case.

So what's it all about Alfie? Why so many reviews?

[Oscar]

Probably because I haven't read them... nothing to do with my stupidity in this case.

So what's it all about Alfie? Why so many reviews?

So you're saying that you know absolutely nothing about what this body does, but you're prepared to slag it off?
You don't know what it does but you don't think it should do it six times?
Sounds like everything to do with stupidity in your case.

[carbonhed]

So you're saying that you know absolutely nothing about what this body does, but you're prepared to slag it off?
You don't know what it does but you don't think it should do it six times?
Sounds like everything to do with stupidity in your case.

Have you know you're dealing with the "idiot savant" of stupid here... heavy on the idiot.

[mashman]

So you're saying that you know absolutely nothing about what this body does, but you're prepared to slag it off?
You don't know what it does but you don't think it should do it six times?
Sounds like everything to do with stupidity in your case.

So as per, you've got nothing. No evidence of any knowledge other than your claims.

Have you know you're dealing with the "idiot savant" of stupid here... heavy on the idiot.

[Oscar]

So as per, you've got nothing. No evidence of any knowledge other than your claims.

My claims?

Where did I "claim" anything?
I merely replied to your post and asked if you had any idea what you speaking of.

You are currently engaged in the internet equivalent of standing on your own tongue...

[mashman]

Not generation ME... but but but.