Stupid World

[jonbuoy]

Yup..........

What scientists are you talking about then?

[mashman]

What scientists are you talking about then?

There were scientists in there... but lame troll looks to have been obvious troll also.

[jonbuoy]

There were scientists in there... but lame troll looks to have been obvious troll also.

No scientist were pointing the finger in that report. Which bit of that article didnt you agree with?

[mashman]

No scientist were pointing the finger in that report. Which bit of that article didnt you agree with?

The bit that labelled people as dumb.

[Akzle]

The bit that labelled people as dumb.

dooooood. look around. they are.

[bogan]

The bit that labelled people as dumb.

A rather ironic statement considering the thread title

[mashman]

dooooood. look around. they are.

Nah, just loads of people who haven't collected any knowledge and therefore need to be labelled as dumb by those with knowledge who believe that they know better, but quite obviously don't, and are therefore dumber than those without knowledge. They're the dumb ones. Case in point:

A rather ironic statement considering the thread title

FFS what is the world coming to when ya can't generalise on KB in the affirmative.

[bogan]

Nah, just loads of people who haven't collected any knowledge and therefore need to be labelled as dumb by those with knowledge who believe that they know better, but quite obviously don't, and are therefore dumber than those without knowledge. They're the dumb ones. Case in point:



FFS what is the world coming to when ya can't generalise on KB in the affirmative.

So, you're saying those who believe in evolution are dumb, because they call those who don't dumb? Nothing to do with the sheer weight of evidence in their favor, you would call them all dumb simply because they can't be fucked with the PC bullshit and are willing to call others out on their stupid ways? Still sounds awfully ironic given the thread title.

Stupid?

[jonbuoy]

Nah, just loads of people who haven't collected any knowledge and therefore need to be labelled as dumb by those with knowledge who believe that they know better, but quite obviously don't, and are therefore dumber than those without knowledge. They're the dumb ones.

But you and Blue Rider do it in almost every post you make?

[blue rider]

more details on the ice melt in the western Antarctica for those that are interested in that sort of stuff

http://www.theguardian.com/environme...pean-satellite

[Ocean1]

But you and Blue Rider do it in almost every post you make?

Aye. You know what they say about a little knowledge?






















What are you still doing here? You won't find it in this thread, it's strictly for clueless malcontents.

[blue rider]

a couple of years ago i lived in the Netherlands and I did enjoy the grachten, and the dykes, and the millions of kilometers of cycle lanes. t'was fun to live there.

http://www.theguardian.com/environme...-climatechange

interesting approach to flooding and flood control

[10bikekid]

So, you're saying those who believe in evolution are dumb, because they call those who don't dumb? Nothing to do with the sheer weight of evidence in their favor, you would call them all dumb simply because they can't be ---- with the PC bull and are willing to call others out on their stupid ways? Still sounds awfully ironic given the thread title.

Stupid?

Maybe

http://www.amazon.com/In-Six-Days-Sc...=cm_cr_pr_pb_t

http://www.openculture.com/2011/07/5...about_god.html

[bogan]

Maybe

http://www.amazon.com/In-Six-Days-Sc...=cm_cr_pr_pb_t

http://www.openculture.com/2011/07/5...about_god.html

Did you just censor my post in you quote?

[Brian d marge]

What are you still doing here? You won't find it in this thread, it's strictly for clueless malcontents.

Welcome to your nivana

Stephen