I gave you more than enough evidence. @10 years. They're saying we have approximately 10 years to start turning things around. Climate change will play its part, but focusing on CO2 to debunk the destruction that's taking place (where do you think your laptop comes from, or your phone, or your house or shows or clothes or roading or lights or glass or or or or or or or tis all bits of planet) is gullibility personified. CO2 is for the dimwitted to argue over whilst production continues.
Yeah sure. Earth Overshoot of the UK sits at 1 sustainable planet used by the 17 May each year. As such, the UK uses approximately 2.7 sustainable planets per year to conduct BAU. If the UK were to address their Overshoot, they would have to cut approximately 2/3's of their economic activity in order to be sustainable i.e. produce less than can be regenerated. Aaaaand for comparison purposes, NZ uses 1 sustainable planet by 6 May. How can a country of 65 million people have a lower carbon footprint than a country with 5 million? By default, wiping out NZ over the UK is better for the future, ha, go figure.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Despite all the recent news about the expansion of US energy supplies
- and the US now being the largest global exporter of energy, it seems
that it all comes with environmental (and financial) costs.
And thems that incurred the costs may not be the ones meeting the costs
of remediation at the end of the day. The US public has something to look
forward to, in coming years:
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2019...ing-money.html
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2019...king-boom.html
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2019...o-exports.html
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-50107320
Suppose that with all the Brexit to-and-fro going on at the moment,
it's a good time to just quietly drop this little item into the press. And
trust that it will be largely overlooked.
https://wallstreetonparade.com/2019/...ng-4-trillion/
Obviously, being a major US bank comes with extra privileges.
You got nothing then Instigatur? Just the usual ignore the evidence. Typical activist.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
^^ He doesnt know the difference between an opinion and actual evidence. It figures.
If you were talking to me I was ignoring your Opinion. That fact of the matter is you didnt post a jot of evidence for me to ignore.
And im the "activist" when he's the one supporting a bunch of loonie tune extinction rebellion retards....
Earth Overshoot and Natural Planetary Systems are exceptionally well documented evidence. That you do not understand this is not a surprise... activist trolls work more effectively when they're dumber than a box of spanners. You activists are all the same. All mouth and zero ability to cognise anything that does not fit within your drama circle. However in the case of the instigatur (it is an anagram of your chosen moniker, dumb ass) your case, Trump the inconsequential, you should be proud of yourself for getting the dumbass Trump commentator troll gig (obviously tailored to your lack of knowledge about anything), coz there must have been millions who were considered, and you were chosen. You are a roll model to all ostriches. Heil mein fuhrer.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Only the garb and names were changed to protect the innocents? https://twitter.com/HenryMakow/statu...rymakow.com%2F - (It's an old trick but it just might work again?) -
There are currently 829 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 829 guests)
Bookmarks