Anyway, the queen is back in my good book after telling parliament over there to pull the stick out of their asses and finish brexit off.
Anyway, the queen is back in my good book after telling parliament over there to pull the stick out of their asses and finish brexit off.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Correct.
So, if they are never going to stop protesting - why bother trying to appease them?
If there is nothing we can do that will make them happy, then we may as well ignore them - as the net result is better for us.
Then we also need to look at the underlying motivation - if nothing will make them happy, where does that lead to: When we are either all dead and Nature can do as Nature wants or we are reverted back to an animalistic existence.
Either way - no thanks.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
I'd suggest that that is a question that can't really be quantified.
I suspect that 'society' will determine when enough protesting has been done.
And with specific regard to environmental issues, I'd also suggest they we're only just seeing the start of any real significant amount of protesting.
I know, that is the point of asking it, to show that there is not a definitive problem that can be identified and fixed and make them happy, the point is that they will never be happy. And so all attempts to appease them are pointless.
There's definitely a Bell Curve of sorts, on some issues, there is enough wider society buy-in to make changes, however at the tail end of the curve, there is a group who are the majority of Protestors who will always be protesting.
Maybe, Maybe not.
My prediction is that all the Alarmist Predictions will be shown to be nothing but activists crying wolf, meanwhile Society at large will make small incremental adjustments, until someone comes up with some real alternatives for the likes of Plastic, Energy generation, Energy Storage and mined resources.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
Yup, so the protesting is working. Future generations will be way better informed about the environment, habitat loss etc so that it will be a major consideration in everything we do. Basically if your business plan adversely affects the environment in any way, and/or is not sustainable then it won't happen.
I mentioned vegetables once, but I think I got away with it...........
I would have to flip a coin to decide which one is stupider or more dangerous to this country. The part time PM in this instance is probably making slightly more sense though. But still you've got to wonder when neither of these idiots seem to consider that we could just not let in any. And that should include the refugees that Hannah Tamaki thought might be a good idea when she was caught on the hop this morning to offer them 50k a year not to come.... umm how about we just do nothing! And put all that tax payer money to good use on current NZ citizens!!
https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/natio...pIb7hx_gF8uLvY
Golly G just got back from visiting qatari spy Ilhan Omar in the states im sure to discuss how they can attempt to fuck their respective countries as much as possible before they get the boot!
What are people going to do for work when businesses are no longer allowed to continue trading under those guidelines? Using an approximation of 50% of that which we produce as no longer being allowed to be extracted/produced etc..., where are the new jobs going to come from?... coz jobs are important for some reason, especially the pointless ones.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
There are currently 854 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 854 guests)
Bookmarks