O for Orsume!
Id be worried personally about the PM containing full-names being out-right defamation. Don't know what NZ law does about such things, but it certainly stinks to be sure.
Anyone who goes out of their way to muddy someone elses name, and does so naming full names, is some-one whom I will certainly never trust. I fear now, if I did business with such a person and things went sour for whatever reason, what kind of smear campaign said business-person would run against me?
The whole thing stinks. And I'm really disappointed it was allowed to happen in the first place. No honour, no integrity, no simple god-damned respect.
This is a new low for KB IMHO.
Found it: http://www.howtolaw.co.nz/html/ml146.asp
I'd say it fits the bill very well.
Ooooh some red rep ae? I guess it is worth making a huge fuss over and ensuring you never get any business from certain people yeah? I think I'll be shopping at 1tonne now..![]()
Last edited by huff3r; 8th September 2011 at 12:00. Reason: Found Link :O
Some of you faggots take the internet waaaay to seriously....
![]()
while you piss on about sanctimonious this and innapropriate that, lets just analyze..
Mort - mentioned no names,simply made a post, about a bad purchasing experience he had. he made this post in a thread about bad purchasing experiences. He mentioned NO names. He mentioned NO companies. In fact, the way it was written it could have even been a fictional 'for example'. Mort didbugger all wrong from what I can see. Maybe he stepped close to the line, but thats about it.
Qausi: lied and abused people, used connections to access information that should have been private, used this information to contact and harass people (yes, harass, several of those people complained about your PMs qausi) named names and quite possible defamed a member of this board.
So, why the fuck has qausi not been banned? as for that, any person who assisted him in accessing the onformation should have been given the boot too
thats it innit, few mates of mine received the qausi PM, and that was the FIRST thing most of them said, they had zero idea what it was all about, Now, I reckon qausi's actions have caused many times more harm to himself and his reputation than any action performed by any other person on here
At least Mort didnt go crying like a little bitch to his sugar daddy to get help.
at least mort said what he had to say, out in the open, for ALL to see, instead of sendingsecret squirrell PMs behind someones back like you ya gutless ballbag
I agree with that totally. Id be considering seekingadvice if I was mort, bonus being that since mort has already put qausi over a barrel in court and had his way with him once, he probably stands a good chance!
A bit sickening that SOME PEOPLE DONT HAVE THE BALLS TO COME OUT AND SAY IT HOW IT IS. and thats not limited to qausi, someone helped him for sure, does that someone have the balls to admit it?
No offence to Mort, but writing a post like that which doesn't name names, but which everybody knows does, making it impossible for the basically named party to refute without outing themselves to those that don't know, is not out in the open. It is just as behind the back and gutless. If you wipe his cum off of your chin and out of your eyes, you'll see that yourself.
If you retards can't even leave it at the door of the courts, water under the bridge and all that shite, then man up and sort it once and for all:
Either that or STFU so we don't have to see your petty dramas played out on here.
I seem to remember the previous lows being more humerous though.
Anyway, when people read a post like mort's, and immediatly figure he is probably talking about Quasi gear, shows Quasi has a serious branding problem!
My personal opinion is it would be damn rare to get that sort of problem without it being at least partially the brand's fault.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Perspective mate, I for one am loling at this one
I've never had a bad experience with Quasi, only bloody good ones in fact, but I have to admit I figured that's what it was all about when I read it. I'm not sure if that's a branding problem, or an ability to manipulate social media problem... what do you think?
I don't think the problem is with the brand.
I think the problem is with the mouth-piece.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks