I've wanked on about our dyno here many times...but it really does not lie, and is way advanced compared to a dynojet jobbie. Was impressive enough for Yoshimura Japan to fly out their top boys to suss it out, and they then had three made for themselves after viewing it in action!
That article relates to increasing Efficiency (fuel economy) extracting the most energy/litre of fuel (which is more important in an aircraft than a performance car) - nothing to do with increasing or making more power from an engine regardless of fuel economy.
http://www.f1technical.net/features/250
I love the smell of twin V16's in the morning..
And an article below on increasing fuel economy:
http://www.torquecars.com/tuning/tuning-mpg.php
Regardless, personally Iīm going to be fitting a heat shield or header wrap over my exhaust manifold as the supercharger sits on top of the exhaust manifold, not to take advantage of heated exhaust gasses.
I love the smell of twin V16's in the morning..
I give up. Your not at all paying attention to anything I say, nor it seems correctly interpreting a technical article.
Efficiency + More Fuel = Moar Powaaah.
But whatever, sure cold engines are fantastic, i might go remove my thermostat and add 3 more radiators to my car to lower its temps then...![]()
Difference between a working knowledge, and an actual knowledge. 'Common folk' often know enough to keep things working, or make small improvements, like cold air intake is good, they then misunderstand the reasons and come up with silly conclusions like cold engine is good!
Don't get me wrong, a working knowledge is fine for most people's self maintenance and minor tuning needs (though carb tuning still flummoxes more than it should). But if you want to do some uncommon modding, or design work, it's insufficient.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Maybe you should start working for a top fuel Dragster team, get them to improve their "fuel efficiency". You seem to know more than engine tuners and dyno results. Are you actually reading any of the links? Where have I mentioned a "cold" engine? Efficiency + More Fuel = rich mixture! You need "moar" air to burn "moar" fuel.
If you modify a standard engine (especially adding forced induction) to make significantly more power (burn more air fuel mix) more waste heat will be generated. If that heat builds up in the engine compartment by it will affect the temperature of the intake charge, longevity of everything from the battery to the ECU not to mention heating up brake fluids and the fuel itself. This is a bad thing. Thats my point. Exhaust pipes emit a fair amount of heat into the engine bay - covering them with a heat shield, header wrap will reduce the amount of heat in the engine bay. Which was my original point a few pages ago. Or will the latest craze for the WRC, F1, Moto GP teams be to seal up those engine bays, blank off those radiators as we now know - moar heat=moar power![]()
Last edited by jonbuoy; 7th September 2011 at 23:59. Reason: Added points
I love the smell of twin V16's in the morning..
You'd probably melt the exhaust wrap off the pipes on one of them and there's no need for it, the pipe length is so short and scavenging effect would be redundant and keeping heat in one of those things is NOT a good idea....after all, the exhaust valves are red hot and igniting the fuel after half track
Find me a dyno that can handle their power too....
It's called 'lagging' you retards.
![]()
.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks