On January 16, 2005 during a powhiri (or greeting ceremony) which formed part of a Waitangi Tribunal hearing, Tāme Iti fired a shotgun into a New Zealand flag in close proximity to a large number of people
On January 16, 2005 during a powhiri (or greeting ceremony) which formed part of a Waitangi Tribunal hearing, Tāme Iti fired a shotgun into a New Zealand flag in close proximity to a large number of people
Never too old to Rock n Roll.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
I've got miserly tourettes and I don't give a fuck.
Allegation because you made the claim without supporting evidence ...
Yes - he was convicted of discharging a firearm in a public place and fined. (I thopught he'd got off - I was wrong) That's a long way from terrorist activity and a long way from discharging a firearm without regard for others ... And Tame says it was an Aussie flag - looked the same lying on the ground - because he didn't want to be charged with destroying a New Zealand flag ..
I fail to see how the ceremonial firing of a gun on a marae during a powhiri can be illegal - and yes, I do know he was convicted.
And I can't find any reference to the sots to scare kids ... Help me out here?
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
that actually makes for quite comical reading...
"About 300 police, including members of the Armed Offenders and anti-terror squads, were involved in the raids in which four guns and 230 rounds of ammunition were seized and 17 people arrested, all but one of them charged with firearms offences."
16 charged with firearms offences and only 4 guns found... errrrrrrm... did they just arrest everyone because there were 4 guns present?
and how does this work "The owner of Christchurch gun dealer Gun City, which is supposed to have supplied about 5% of the group's weapons"... 5% of 4 guns = errrrrrrrrm... (it's just how I read it, ok)
anyhoo... t'would seem like an overreation to arrest them all (especially given the survivalist nonsense and their bush training)... why not just send the police there for a chat, or a politician to explain exactly what the problem with their activities was.
Sounds like a racist double standard to me![]()
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
old scribblehead will be wanting compensation from whitey now
Just the usual level of incompetence... nothing to see here, move along.
Redefining slow since 2006...
Apparently he is/was a member of the NZ Communist Party. That's enough for me.
They raided the homes and terrorised the familys of a group of people that had got togeather to discuss the best ways to present their arguements to the gov't of the day,,,and the most effective ways to stage a protest.
Part of their plan was to hold he women and children of those they were tring to terrorise at gun point whilist dressed up in black clothing with blacked out faces and carrying the same sort of firearms they increasingly denigh the general population.
Then of course they trumped up as many false charges as they could so as to cost the inoccent so much money in defending themselves that they are still in debt today.
Think about this the next time you decide to ride on the bee hive with some self obsessed whinge about having to pay your own way for things like ACC.
It worked against the niggers and a few invironmental freaks,,,so it will probably work against you to,,,after all,,the fuckers have had their practice,,and it worked great.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks