Na I just think it's cause no self-respecting photoshop'r wouldOriginally Posted by imdying
God's Evil Twin
Na I just think it's cause no self-respecting photoshop'r would
Science Is But An Organized System Of Ignorance"Pornography: The thing with billions of views that nobody watches" - WhiteManBehindADesk
ArseBiscuit
The conspiracy theorists are too busy telling us that climate change is a hoax.
Hardcore Biker
it's just space junk
***** POLITICIANS *****
People Of Little Integrity Thieving Innocent Citizens Incomes And Need Shooting
*******KASPA*******
Knavery Artificial Spurious Pretentious Arseholes
i'm motarded
Fuck the moon, I'd rather go to Uranus.
ArseBiscuit
Or a black hole.
i'm motarded
bleach it man!
Hardcore Biker
Why do people always blame the dark guy?It was Mr Black in the drawing room, using the candlestick!
Come warm yourself by the fire
While I do think we went to the moon. This evidence is bullshit.
How come I can use google to zoom into me (to the point of me recognizing my own smile on my face) having a wank on the back lawn, but all the gazzilion pixel camera's on earth combined with the super telescopes we have now (and off it) can take a clear photo of a 5m high moon lander sitting on the closest rock to earth.
NASA has to come up with something better than this.
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
Forum whore
Google Earth does not have to look through the atmosphere in its entirety before getting a shot at the distant target.
They did, Hubble etc etc. They'll get there.
Little ol'Hornet Rides again!
Because they're always saying things like "where all dem white wimmen at?"Gosh, I see a saddle ablaze!
"I like to ride anyplace, anywhere, any time, any way!"
sdkfz
Firstly you over-state the detail available.
Secondly you forget that the best of those photos are not taken by satellites - they are taken by planes.
Not even the Hubble space telescope has the angular resolution to take a "good" picture of the Apollo landing stages. The reason it can show us Galaxies so far away, is that those Galaxies are so darn big.
Compare Apples with Apples.
Measure once, cut twice. Practice makes perfect.
Come warm yourself by the fire
So you can't see the moon at night because the atmosphere is too thick?
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
Anarchic Wild Child
Fuck - talk about multi-tasking!!! Wanking and using Google Earth to watch yoursef at the same time ...
And isnt that taking auto-eroticisim to extremes?
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
Come warm yourself by the fire
Actually the problem with Hubble is actually due fact that the lens it is setup for is designed to focus on things outside our solar system.
Its just disappointing that we seemed to be able to fixate on the fantastic images we get from orbiting mars, but we can't seem to get a good photo of the damn big thing sitting in the night sky.
We have much more out there including Hubble though. Saw a good film a while ago showed something like 40+ probes shooting past planets and moons in our system and sending the info back.
Yet we can't seem to focus on the lump of chalk 384,403 km away. Surely there is a camera out there that could focus on it.........I bet the Russians are hiding all their moon photo's lol
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
Come warm yourself by the fire
Unfortunately the photos on google earth are from a while ago.
So I am not as big as I am now. lol
But back on topic. Thank god the mirrors were left on the moon so we can shoot lazers at them
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks