A bold statement if I ever heard one. I hope someone will back it up.
Valid points.
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...post1130189225
If you do the numbers you will see the 4-strokes are clearly getting close to what is practical but the 2 strokers still have much more room for development at reasonable cost.
Have you seen what the stroker girl and boys are starting to turn up with.
Yes agreed, you have to ride fast to be fast, so it won't be me winning the next GP, but I think the 4-stroke boys need to get their skates on or some good rider out there and there are a few of them around the country will show up with an all conquering stroker soon.
I know it won't be me winning the next one either. The guys / gals that are fast won't be doing it on HP alone, handling and skill have a lot to do with it, yes on a long track power is much more important than on the kart tracks we usually race on up here but even with a slower bike there is a truckload of fun to be had. I had ball at the GP, in both races, even though I got lapped by the field in F5, including by my wife. Would I have got a better result if F4 if I hadn't run in F5 as well? Possibly, would more power have helped, probably, would I do it all the same knowing that I was going to be lapped by guys I can usually beat at Mt Wellington? Absolutely.
There were about 6 people at Taupo with a shot at the number one plate, the rest of us were there for other reasons be that catching up with mates from around the country or to work on the development on the engine type of their choice, the whole two versus four discussion is an interesting distraction but doesn't have all that much bearing on what goes on on track.
If Andrew had been on a fast two stroke would he still have won? Can't honestly say but my money would be on him being at the front scrapping for it. It really isn't all about the bike.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks