Youve got 28 days to do a resit, this does not have to be done at the same VTNZ you can get your resit done anywhere if it were my situation i would take it to another VTNZ and have it retested...
Youve got 28 days to do a resit, this does not have to be done at the same VTNZ you can get your resit done anywhere if it were my situation i would take it to another VTNZ and have it retested...
Lifes short DRINK BEER!
“- He felt that his whole life was some kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.”
I believe the technical term for this wonderful test is called a "brake (or break) test".
They used to be common place back in the day when people gave a damn and didn't have a checklist.
I love the fact the "Screw back" fittings are considered illegal......yet from an industrial sense they are fantastic.....and crimp fittings are "those ones that leak all the time".
Perhaps its review time......tests need to be performed. Facts need to be updated.
Checklists need to be improved.
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
I am now wondering if they will let us have push-lock lines. Those can spin and not undo.
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
Regardless of how you interpret the wording, the question of legality lies with the distinction between brake lines that rely on the integrity of the fitting of a ferrul by who knows what class of monkey and brake lines with swivel fittings crimped onto brake lines by a factory that has met certification standards.
The hoses in the OP are of the latter type.
and my KR1 stuff has a screw together bit in the middle where it goes from one line to two, guess that is no good either
I just got an aftermarket line for the rear which has similar fitting to the OP's, unlikely to get pulled up on it, but good to know that it relates to the hose-end crimp bit just in case.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
climb off your high horse and consider the possibility that, while the brakes will probably work when you take the bike in an hour after installing them, home made crap on such an important part of the bike has no proven longevity of performance.
Keeping a strict standard might seem annoying to those cheapasses that thing stuffing some wedges of wood in instead of brake pads will suffice, but a set standard that is unwavering means that only fittings that have already proven longevity in reliability and performance means that (hopefully) bikes that are legally on the road are actually safer
I have the general KB view on it (not counting bsasuper), now I am going to find out if I can change Mr VTNZ technician's view of it. Check back in a couple of hours to see what happens!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks