You forget the history of Simoncelli's riding that year. Fell off while leading at Jerez, fell off on lap one at Estoril .... journalists were writing pieces about their concerns for his lack of restraint and his need to learn how to finish races. Not the screaming Spanish tabloids but the more reasoned media.
Collided with Pedrosa at Le Mans, with the accident breaking Pedrosa's collarbone. He later reflected on his riding style. He was asked to meet with race direction before his next race at Catalonia, regarding his riding style which was causing concerns among a number of riders and officials.
So what I am saying, nay, reporting, is that there were concerns about Simoncelli's riding style and judgement before his accident - this from David Emmett's Motomatters website: it is his riding which has endeared him to the fans. The boy is fast, utterly fearless and willing to fight for every inch of the track. Simoncelli stands aside for no man, which means that at any time, at any track, he can pull the most astonishing moves to try and either defend his position or snatch a place from out of the blue. The fans love it.
The riders, not so much. That impetuousness, seizing the first hint of a gap as soon as it opens, and opening it by force if necessary, has not made him very popular with the remainder of the MotoGP field. Simoncelli, they say, is a wildcard, a rider who is so unpredictable that they don't feel comfortable racing in close proximity with him. The kind of fairing-bashing action that leaves tire marks all over leathers may make Simoncelli a favorite with the fans, but having to deal with it at 300 km/h while manhandling a MotoGP bike around is not an enjoyable experience.
If you want to read Emmett's summary of Simoncelli in 2011, read here, well worth a look.
Simoncelli's accident happened five months later. I don't think it's too long a bow to draw to say the events are interlinked.
Bookmarks