Page 29 of 270 FirstFirst ... 1927282930313979129 ... LastLast
Results 421 to 435 of 4048

Thread: MotoGP 2012

  1. #421
    Join Date
    6th March 2006 - 15:57
    Bike
    Rolls Royce RB211
    Location
    Martinborough
    Posts
    3,041
    Quote Originally Posted by denill View Post
    Carmelo Ezpeleta talked to Dennis Noyes: And I reckon he is making the best choices for the conundrum he is faced with. Not ideal but necessary.
    Yeah, necessary thanks to that bunch of idjits called the MSMA. Things could have been soooo much different if they'd been a lil' more forward thinking.

  2. #422
    Join Date
    26th March 2008 - 08:32
    Bike
    1981 XS650
    Location
    Auckland - Farm Cove
    Posts
    283
    It sounds a bit pussy......but i tend to agree, Im not sure top speed makes for better racing....and having hit 200+ k once or twice I have no idea how these guys can race at 300+....amazing


    One item of concern for Lorenzo in the new 1000cc era is the higher top speeds the powerful prototypes are able to reach. He believes there should be a line drawn at the maximum attainable speed in competition:

    "It's unlikely that a crash will occur at 340 or 350kph in a straight line, but if it did, it would be almost impossible not to have serious consequences, so for me there’s no need to go 350kph in a straight line. I think 310, 320kph is more than enough speed to race at; Speed doesn’t make the race, what we wanted the last few years was more of a show for the fans, but I think there is a limit. We’ve reached 350kph. I think it’s too much," concluded Lorenzo.

  3. #423
    Join Date
    6th April 2004 - 09:51
    Bike
    empty garage )-:
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,198
    Quote Originally Posted by cmoore View Post
    It sounds a bit pussy......but i tend to agree, Im not sure top speed makes for better racing....and having hit 200+ k once or twice I have no idea how these guys can race at 300+....amazing


    One item of concern for Lorenzo in the new 1000cc era is the higher top speeds the powerful prototypes are able to reach. He believes there should be a line drawn at the maximum attainable speed in competition:

    "It's unlikely that a crash will occur at 340 or 350kph in a straight line, but if it did, it would be almost impossible not to have serious consequences, so for me there’s no need to go 350kph in a straight line. I think 310, 320kph is more than enough speed to race at; Speed doesn’t make the race, what we wanted the last few years was more of a show for the fans, but I think there is a limit. We’ve reached 350kph. I think it’s too much," concluded Lorenzo.
    Pardon my ignorance but what would be the difference in result when crashing at 320kmph compared with 350kmph?!
    "...New Zealanders, for all their faults, have virtues that are precious: an unwillingness to be intimidated by the new, the formidable, or class systems; trust in situations where there would otherwise be none; compassion for the underdog; a sense of responsibility for people in difficulty; not undertaking to do something without seeing it through - "
    Michael King

  4. #424
    Join Date
    26th March 2008 - 08:32
    Bike
    1981 XS650
    Location
    Auckland - Farm Cove
    Posts
    283
    30 kph....

  5. #425
    Join Date
    17th April 2006 - 05:39
    Bike
    Various things
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    14,429
    Quote Originally Posted by Cleve View Post
    Pardon my ignorance but what would be the difference in result when crashing at 320kmph compared with 350kmph?!
    The fastest Moto GP crash of all time was Nakano at Mugello wannit? Over the bars at 340kph when his back tyre fell apart and locked the back wheel up when it jammed in the swingarm?

    Very rare that a biff happens in a straight line other wise. Apart from the two 250 boys slamming into each other down Mugello's front straight. Was it Bautista and Lorenzo? Or De Angelis? Front brake getting jammed on for you...

  6. #426
    Join Date
    19th August 2003 - 15:32
    Bike
    RD350 KTM790R, 2 x BMW R80G/S, XT500
    Location
    Over there somewhere...
    Posts
    3,954
    Quote Originally Posted by Crasherfromwayback View Post
    The fastest Moto GP crash of all time was Nakano at Mugello wannit? Over the bars at 340kph when his back tyre fell apart and locked the back wheel up when it jammed in the swingarm?
    The telemetry showed that when the wheel went light at the top of a bump, it spun up to an effective speed of 430km/h+ and the tyre flew apart.

  7. #427
    Join Date
    17th April 2006 - 05:39
    Bike
    Various things
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    14,429
    Quote Originally Posted by Oscar View Post
    The telemetry showed that when the wheel went light at the top of a bump, it spun up to an effective speed of 430km/h+ and the tyre flew apart.
    Then I'd have to say the 'telemetry' is surely talking shit. What RPM would the engine have to do to get the rear wheel spinning at that speed...when the real wheel was already spinning at 340 odd kph with the engine at close to redline in top?

    I know they say the the rear wheel speed sensor says it's spinning at much higher speeds due to wheel spin etc...but 430kph?

    Never.

  8. #428
    Join Date
    19th August 2003 - 15:32
    Bike
    RD350 KTM790R, 2 x BMW R80G/S, XT500
    Location
    Over there somewhere...
    Posts
    3,954
    Quote Originally Posted by Crasherfromwayback View Post
    Then I'd have to say the 'telemetry' is surely talking shit. What RPM would the engine have to do to get the rear wheel spinning at that speed...when the real wheel was already spinning at 340 odd kph with the engine at close to redline in top?

    I know they say the the rear wheel speed sensor says it's spinning at much higher speeds due to wheel spin etc...but 430kph?

    Never.
    The wheel almost came off of the ground and lit up, causing the tyre to shred.
    How long would that take?
    Several milliseconds?

  9. #429
    Join Date
    17th April 2006 - 05:39
    Bike
    Various things
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    14,429
    Quote Originally Posted by Oscar View Post
    The wheel almost came off of the ground and lit up, causing the tyre to shred.
    How long would that take?
    Several milliseconds?
    It's not that Oscar. It's the fact that the engine couldn't possibly pull the revs to let the rear wheel spin to such speeds in my opinion.

  10. #430
    Join Date
    19th August 2003 - 15:32
    Bike
    RD350 KTM790R, 2 x BMW R80G/S, XT500
    Location
    Over there somewhere...
    Posts
    3,954
    Quote Originally Posted by Crasherfromwayback View Post
    It's not that Oscar. It's the fact that the engine couldn't possibly pull the revs to let the rear wheel spin to such speeds in my opinion.
    The story was related by an ex-crew chief who worked for 2D Telemetry.
    I'm not arguing with ze Chermans.

  11. #431
    Join Date
    17th April 2006 - 05:39
    Bike
    Various things
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    14,429
    Quote Originally Posted by Oscar View Post
    The story was related by an ex-crew chief who worked for 2D Telemetry.
    I'm not arguing with ze Chermans.
    Do the math.

  12. #432
    Join Date
    6th March 2006 - 15:57
    Bike
    Rolls Royce RB211
    Location
    Martinborough
    Posts
    3,041
    Quote Originally Posted by Crasherfromwayback View Post
    Do the math.
    Exactly what I was thinking mate! Wheel is direct coupled to engine, engine has a rev limiter. I can see a slight over-rev but not those sorts of numbers.

  13. #433
    Join Date
    17th April 2006 - 05:39
    Bike
    Various things
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    14,429
    Quote Originally Posted by slowpoke View Post
    Exactly what I was thinking mate! Wheel is direct coupled to engine, engine has a rev limiter. I can see a slight over-rev but not those sorts of numbers.
    Yeah I may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer...but those numbers don't compute. Rev limiters aside (they can be bypassed down shifting etc, hence why 'desmo' is a good thing), but the motor would've 'popped' if the rear wheel had spun at 400+ kph.

    Someone is telling porkies.

  14. #434
    Join Date
    18th October 2007 - 08:20
    Bike
    1970 Vespa ss90
    Location
    Schärding
    Posts
    1,831
    Quote Originally Posted by Crasherfromwayback View Post
    Yeah I may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer...but those numbers don't compute. Rev limiters aside (they can be bypassed down shifting etc, hence why 'desmo' is a good thing), but the motor would've 'popped' if the rear wheel had spun at 400+ kph.

    Someone is telling porkies.
    I would surmise that the wheel (and therefore tyre) accelerated to it's terminal speed (what ever that is) much faster that it was capable of doing if it was in contact with the track, hence..... destruction.

  15. #435
    Join Date
    17th April 2006 - 05:39
    Bike
    Various things
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    14,429
    Quote Originally Posted by Oscar View Post
    The story was related by an ex-crew chief who worked for 2D Telemetry.
    I'm not arguing with ze Chermans.
    Quote Originally Posted by SS90 View Post
    I would surmise that the wheel (and therefore tyre) accelerated to it's terminal speed (what ever that is) much faster that it was capable of doing if it was in contact with the track, hence..... destruction.
    I wonder if they're actually geared for around 400kph? I read a while back that the rear wheel was doing some 50 kph more than the front due to wheel spin in the upper speeds due to the drag.

    Regardless...I remember watching that biff, and it was hell scary.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •